Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Fresno City 21 579 195 121 58 58 .337 .404 .528
550.0 2 Sequoias 23 625 205 124 33 44 .328 .367 .446
0.0 3 Porterville 20 498 151 96 73 85 .303 .397 .476
1054.0 4 Reedley 25 655 188 99 58 63 .287 .351 .342
0.0 5 Merced 20 504 135 73 64 63 .268 .349 .381
0.0 5 Taft 18 420 109 47 25 91 .260 .301 .324
0.0 5 Coalinga 18 370 75 29 25 78 .203 .257 .259
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Fresno City 21 46 4 19 69
550.0 2 Sequoias 23 29 15 5 49
0.0 3 Porterville 20 24 4 18 46
0.0 3 Merced 20 23 8 6 37
1054.0 5 Reedley 25 27 3 1 31
0.0 6 Taft 18 16 4 1 21
0.0 6 Coalinga 18 16 1 1 18
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
550.0 1 Sequoias 23 149 279 6 4
4 2 Fresno City 21 145 306 21 3
1054.0 3 Reedley 25 129 224 69 7
0.0 4 Porterville 20 112 237 12 3
0.0 4 Merced 20 89 192 22 3
0.0 4 Taft 18 61 136 25 7
0.0 4 Coalinga 18 37 96 12 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1054.0 1 Reedley 25 9 5 29 10 170 130 1.31 756
550.0 2 Sequoias 23 10 8 27 5 115 127 .91 703
703 3 Fresno City 21 9 2 9 3 49 52 .94 657
0.0 4 Merced 20 4 10 5 1 88 107 .82 587
0.0 4 Porterville 20 5 1 10 2 41 46 .89 587
0.0 4 Taft 18 0 0 0 1 41 46 .89 445
0.0 4 Coalinga 18 2 - 2 2 44 28 1.57 399
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.0 1 Taft 18 18 83.0 249 237 143 12.06
0.0 1 Coalinga 18 18 95.1 210 242 134 9.84
0.0 1 Porterville 20 20 114.2 200 180 117 7.14
1054.0 4 Reedley 25 25 158.0 214 138 105 4.65
0.0 5 Merced 20 20 120.2 158 106 74 4.29
4.29 6 Fresno City 21 21 121.0 167 109 67 3.88
550.0 7 Sequoias 23 23 145.2 145 87 76 3.65
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.0 1 Taft 18 18 60 5.06 7 3.72
0.0 1 Coalinga 18 18 35 2.57 12 3.31
0.0 1 Porterville 20 20 28 1.71 7 2.32
2.32 4 Fresno City 21 21 56 3.24 14 1.89
1054.0 5 Reedley 25 25 57 2.53 20 1.66
0.0 6 Merced 20 20 75 4.35 2 1.49
550.0 7 Sequoias 23 23 148 7.11 7 1.24
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
550.0 1 Sequoias 23 577 432 118 27 1 .953
.953 2 Fresno City 21 558 348 181 29 3 .948
1054.0 3 Reedley 25 706 487 177 42 1 .941
0.0 4 Merced 20 518 359 120 39 9 .925
0.0 4 Porterville 20 596 340 194 62 13 .896
0.0 4 Coalinga 18 554 254 239 61 9 .890
0.0 4 Taft 18 411 250 88 73 42 .822
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
1054.0 1 Reedley 25 6 12 4 .250 0
0.0 2 Merced 20 2 30 4 .118 0
0 3 Fresno City 21 10 18 2 .100 0
550.0 4 Sequoias 23 3 26 2 .071 0
0.0 5 Taft 18 2 50 2 .038 0
0.0 5 Porterville 20 1 38 1 .026 0
0.0 5 Coalinga 18 - 84 - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
1054.0 1 Reedley 13.0 1,054 82
550.0 2 Sequoias 12.0 550 46
0.0 3 Coalinga 10.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 8.0 0 0
0.0 3 Porterville 8.0 0 0
0.0 3 Taft 10.0 0 0
0 7 Fresno City 7.0 - -
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
$value 1 Fresno City 6 175 65 36 13 13 .371 .424 .560
50.0 2 Sequoias 4 111 44 28 4 3 .396 .412 .559
0.0 3 Porterville 5 129 29 23 26 27 .225 .355 .442
382.0 4 Reedley 7 188 63 43 16 16 .335 .391 .404
0.0 5 Merced 6 166 63 43 19 17 .380 .432 .608
.608 6 Taft 6 127 28 5 7 37 .220 .261 .252
0.0 7 Coalinga 6 119 15 4 10 24 .126 .194 .160
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
$value 1 Fresno City 6 18 0 5 23
50.0 2 Sequoias 4 5 2 3 10
0.0 3 Porterville 5 5 1 7 13
0.0 3 Merced 6 12 7 4 23
382.0 5 Reedley 7 13 - - 13
13 6 Taft 6 4 0 0 4
0.0 7 Coalinga 6 2 1 - 3
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
50.0 1 Sequoias 4 36 62 0 0
0 2 Fresno City 6 52 98 13 0
382.0 3 Reedley 7 57 76 35 4
0.0 4 Porterville 5 28 57 2 0
0.0 4 Merced 6 56 101 17 1
1 6 Taft 6 10 32 2 3
0.0 7 Coalinga 6 3 19 1 -
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
382.0 1 Reedley 7 2 1 6 1 45 26 1.73 213
50.0 2 Sequoias 4 1 3 8 1 22 23 .96 127
127 3 Fresno City 6 3 0 6 1 7 12 .58 197
0.0 4 Merced 6 1 6 2 - 11 32 .34 194
0.0 4 Porterville 5 0 0 3 - 5 18 .28 158
158 6 Taft 6 0 0 0 1 11 16 .69 134
0.0 7 Coalinga 6 - - - - 11 13 .85 129
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
$value 1 Taft 6 6 28.2 62 70 42 10.26
0.0 2 Coalinga 6 6 32.2 82 82 53 11.36
0.0 2 Porterville 5 5 33.0 37 25 12 2.55
382.0 4 Reedley 7 7 43.0 42 26 17 2.77
0.0 5 Merced 6 6 33.0 34 20 10 2.12
2.12 6 Fresno City 6 6 37.0 31 15 8 1.51
50.0 7 Sequoias 4 4 24.0 22 5 4 1.17
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Taft 6 6 20 4.88 2 2.90
0.0 2 Coalinga 6 6 12 2.57 4 3.15
0.0 2 Porterville 5 5 5 1.06 2 1.36
1.36 4 Fresno City 6 6 25 4.73 5 1.32
382.0 5 Reedley 7 7 20 3.26 5 1.40
0.0 6 Merced 6 6 33 7.00 0 1.24
50.0 7 Sequoias 4 4 21 6.13 1 1.00
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
50.0 1 Sequoias 4 93 71 18 4 0 .957
.957 2 Fresno City 6 190 114 72 4 0 .979
382.0 3 Reedley 7 217 135 70 12 - .945
0.0 4 Merced 6 142 99 33 10 2 .930
0.0 4 Porterville 5 184 97 72 15 4 .918
0.0 4 Coalinga 6 246 115 109 22 6 .911
.911 7 Taft 6 149 86 34 29 25 .805
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
382.0 1 Reedley 7 2 - 1 1.000 -
0.0 2 Merced 6 1 5 2 .286 0
0 3 Fresno City 6 3 3 2 .400 0
50.0 4 Sequoias 4 1 4 0 .000 0
0 5 Taft 6 0 22 0 .000 0
0.0 6 Porterville 5 0 4 0 .000 0
0.0 6 Coalinga 6 - 32 - - -
Rk Team home games attend avg
382.0 1 Reedley 5.0 382 77
50.0 2 Sequoias 2.0 50 25
0.0 3 Coalinga 4.0 0 0
0.0 3 Merced 2.0 0 0
0.0 3 Porterville 1 0 0
0 6 Taft 2.0 - -
- 7 Fresno City 4.0 - -