California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.4331864904552129 1	Chaffey	40	1186	429	251	113	102	.362	.433	.498
0.39903846153846156 2	Mt. San Antonio	48	1281	427	250	124	117	.333	.399	.472
0.3917525773195876 3	Pasadena City	43	1186	372	200	138	139	.314	.392	.392
0.3687821612349914 4	East Los Angeles	38	1065	335	203	74	118	.315	.369	.435
0.3288973384030418 5	Rio Hondo	40	941	242	104	82	140	.257	.329	.325

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.4331864904552129 1	Chaffey	40	81	6	23	110
0.39903846153846156 2	Mt. San Antonio	48	72	6	31	109
0.3687821612349914 3	East Los Angeles	38	52	17	14	83
0.3917525773195876 4	Pasadena City	43	60	9	5	74
0.3288973384030418 5	Rio Hondo	40	34	6	6	46

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.4331864904552129 1	Chaffey	40	290	591	55	10
0.39903846153846156 2	Mt. San Antonio	48	288	604	81	21
0.3917525773195876 3	Pasadena City	43	242	465	117	12
0.3687821612349914 4	East Los Angeles	38	223	463	21	2
0.3288973384030418 5	Rio Hondo	40	121	306	27	7

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.39903846153846156 1	Mt. San Antonio	48	30	21	38	13	303	373	.81	1494
0.3917525773195876 2	Pasadena City	43	22	12	34	13	324	299	1.08	1392
0.4331864904552129 3	Chaffey	40	48	15	9	11	259	298	.87	1371
0.3687821612349914 4	East Los Angeles	38	21	6	24	4	155	133	1.17	1190
0.3288973384030418 5	Rio Hondo	40	22	7	22	21	232	264	.88	1074

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.3288973384030418 1	Rio Hondo	40	40	223.2	450	366	267	8.36
0.3687821612349914 2	East Los Angeles	38	38	246.0	339	216	188	5.35
0.4331864904552129 3	Chaffey	40	40	254.1	324	180	147	4.05
0.3917525773195876 4	Pasadena City	43	43	284.0	301	156	127	3.13
0.39903846153846156 5	Mt. San Antonio	48	48	324.0	261	115	94	2.03

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
0.4331864904552129 1	Chaffey	40	40	90	2.48	11	-
0.39903846153846156 2	Mt. San Antonio	48	48	316	6.83	19	-
0.3917525773195876 3	Pasadena City	43	43	170	4.19	22	-
0.3687821612349914 4	East Los Angeles	38	38	92	2.62	12	-
0.3288973384030418 5	Rio Hondo	40	40	71	2.22	14	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.39903846153846156 1	Mt. San Antonio	48	1247	913	288	46	11	.963
0.3917525773195876 2	Pasadena City	43	1181	852	275	54	11	.954
0.4331864904552129 3	Chaffey	40	1121	703	342	76	10	.932
0.3288973384030418 4	Rio Hondo	40	994	632	243	119	32	.880
0.3687821612349914 5	East Los Angeles	38	616	360	180	76	10	.877

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.39903846153846156 1	Mt. San Antonio	48	7	27	8	.229	-
0.4331864904552129 2	Chaffey	40	6	47	8	.145	-
0.3917525773195876 3	Pasadena City	43	8	49	6	.109	-
0.3288973384030418 4	Rio Hondo	40	14	87	7	.074	-
0.3687821612349914 5	East Los Angeles	38	2	46	1	.021	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.39903846153846156 1	Mt. San Antonio	28.0	2,581	93
0.3917525773195876 2	Pasadena City	19.0	958	50
0.3687821612349914 3	East Los Angeles	17.0	396	24
0.4331864904552129 4	Chaffey	20.0	30	2
0.3288973384030418 5	Rio Hondo	16.0	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.43028846153846156 1	Chaffey	12	373	138	80	32	30	.370	.430	.485
0.40054495912806537 2	Mt. San Antonio	12	333	117	60	26	18	.351	.401	.508
0.38902743142144636 3	Pasadena City	12	350	108	61	43	43	.309	.389	.371
0.328125 4	East Los Angeles	12	356	98	58	20	53	.275	.328	.354
0.2825278810408922 5	Rio Hondo	12	253	60	22	12	29	.237	.283	.281

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.43028846153846156 1	Chaffey	12	28	-	5	33
0.40054495912806537 2	Mt. San Antonio	12	20	1	10	31
0.328125 3	East Los Angeles	12	14	1	4	19
0.38902743142144636 4	Pasadena City	12	16	-	2	18
0.2825278810408922 5	Rio Hondo	12	6	1	1	8

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.43028846153846156 1	Chaffey	12	89	181	11	1
0.40054495912806537 2	Mt. San Antonio	12	67	169	29	7
0.38902743142144636 3	Pasadena City	12	71	130	28	2
0.328125 4	East Los Angeles	12	67	126	4	-
0.2825278810408922 5	Rio Hondo	12	22	71	5	-

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.40054495912806537 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	4	4	13	3	66	90	.73	380
0.38902743142144636 2	Pasadena City	12	5	3	10	2	98	89	1.10	411
0.43028846153846156 3	Chaffey	12	9	2	1	2	86	94	.91	417
0.328125 4	East Los Angeles	12	8	-	10	1	60	62	.97	394
0.2825278810408922 5	Rio Hondo	12	4	-	7	4	83	54	1.54	276

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.2825278810408922 1	Rio Hondo	12	12	62.1	148	136	110	12.35
0.328125 2	East Los Angeles	12	12	80.2	112	63	49	4.25
0.43028846153846156 3	Chaffey	12	12	78.1	104	52	40	3.57
0.38902743142144636 4	Pasadena City	12	12	82.0	91	43	32	2.73
0.40054495912806537 5	Mt. San Antonio	12	12	80.0	66	22	17	1.49

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/7	hr	whip
0.43028846153846156 1	Chaffey	12	12	19	1.70	4	-
0.40054495912806537 2	Mt. San Antonio	12	12	78	6.83	2	-
0.38902743142144636 3	Pasadena City	12	12	35	2.99	9	-
0.328125 4	East Los Angeles	12	12	23	2.00	3	-
0.2825278810408922 5	Rio Hondo	12	12	18	2.02	4	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.40054495912806537 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	285	199	69	17	3	.940
0.38902743142144636 2	Pasadena City	12	358	246	98	14	2	.961
0.43028846153846156 3	Chaffey	12	345	217	99	29	4	.916
0.2825278810408922 4	Rio Hondo	12	251	163	58	30	13	.880
0.328125 5	East Los Angeles	12	270	158	83	29	4	.893

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.40054495912806537 1	Mt. San Antonio	12	3	6	1	.143	-
0.43028846153846156 2	Chaffey	12	3	14	4	.222	-
0.38902743142144636 3	Pasadena City	12	4	7	-	-	-
0.2825278810408922 4	Rio Hondo	12	1	35	2	.054	-
0.328125 5	East Los Angeles	12	1	15	-	-	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.40054495912806537 1	Mt. San Antonio	6.0	468	78
0.38902743142144636 2	Pasadena City	6.0	336	56
0.328125 3	East Los Angeles	6.0	186	31
0.43028846153846156 4	Chaffey	6.0	0	0
0.2825278810408922 5	Rio Hondo	6.0	0	0