Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.4132047477744807 1 Palomar 46 1348 557 367 104 72 .413 .458 .576
0.39761646803900325 2 San Diego Mesa 34 923 367 254 106 66 .398 .467 .606
0.34297520661157027 3 Imperial Valley 36 968 332 209 119 81 .343 .423 .445
0.3260437375745527 4 Mt. San Jacinto 38 1006 328 188 69 114 .326 .377 .417
0.32037037037037036 5 Southwestern 39 1080 346 189 86 80 .320 .383 .415
0.3086548488008342 6 Grossmont 39 959 296 173 98 126 .309 .379 .442
0.29379157427937913 7 San Diego City 37 902 265 144 70 107 .294 .362 .400
0.2851196670135276 8 San Bernardino Valley 39 961 274 147 92 108 .285 .356 .341
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 807 224 123 88 126 .278 .357 .353
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.4132047477744807 1 Palomar 46 99 21 26 146
0.39761646803900325 2 San Diego Mesa 34 84 6 32 122
0.3086548488008342 3 Grossmont 39 55 8 19 82
0.34297520661157027 4 Imperial Valley 36 46 22 3 71
0.29379157427937913 5 San Diego City 37 52 13 6 71
0.32037037037037036 6 Southwestern 39 44 11 12 67
0.3260437375745527 7 Mt. San Jacinto 38 46 12 7 65
0.2851196670135276 8 San Bernardino Valley 39 41 2 3 46
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 29 10 4 43
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.4132047477744807 1 Palomar 46 425 776 81 5
0.39761646803900325 2 San Diego Mesa 34 266 559 5 -
0.34297520661157027 3 Imperial Valley 36 259 431 39 5
0.32037037037037036 4 Southwestern 39 221 448 28 3
0.3260437375745527 5 Mt. San Jacinto 38 219 419 60 16
0.3086548488008342 6 Grossmont 39 198 424 18 7
0.2851196670135276 7 San Bernardino Valley 39 181 328 19 4
0.29379157427937913 8 San Diego City 37 180 361 45 10
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 150 285 50 14
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.4132047477744807 1 Palomar 46 20 14 16 8 330 285 1.16 1502
0.32037037037037036 2 Southwestern 39 29 10 48 11 285 286 1.00 1253
0.34297520661157027 3 Imperial Valley 36 25 12 29 6 151 159 .95 1153
0.3260437375745527 4 Mt. San Jacinto 38 19 8 22 8 179 130 1.38 1124
0.3086548488008342 5 Grossmont 39 17 10 26 12 190 219 .87 1110
0.2851196670135276 6 San Bernardino Valley 39 16 3 33 19 315 181 1.74 1105
0.39761646803900325 7 San Diego Mesa 34 24 11 32 6 206 239 .86 1096
0.29379157427937913 8 San Diego City 37 28 4 29 3 232 232 1.00 1033
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 14 4 15 11 257 133 1.93 928
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.27757125154894674 1 Desert 33 33 192.2 475 375 250 9.08
0.3260437375745527 2 Mt. San Jacinto 38 38 222.2 356 292 233 7.32
0.3086548488008342 3 Grossmont 39 39 224.0 348 289 220 6.88
0.2851196670135276 4 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 221.2 425 282 214 6.76
0.29379157427937913 5 San Diego City 37 37 212.2 306 277 157 5.17
0.39761646803900325 6 San Diego Mesa 34 34 190.0 218 159 133 4.90
0.32037037037037036 7 Southwestern 39 39 250.0 288 145 121 3.39
0.34297520661157027 8 Imperial Valley 36 36 221.0 237 121 90 2.85
0.4132047477744807 9 Palomar 46 46 277.0 160 69 52 1.31
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.4132047477744807 1 Palomar 46 46 331 8.36 6 -
0.39761646803900325 2 San Diego Mesa 34 34 98 3.61 8 -
0.34297520661157027 3 Imperial Valley 36 36 140 4.43 7 -
0.3260437375745527 4 Mt. San Jacinto 38 38 101 3.18 16 -
0.32037037037037036 5 Southwestern 39 39 110 3.08 12 -
0.3086548488008342 6 Grossmont 39 39 72 2.25 10 -
0.29379157427937913 7 San Diego City 37 37 131 4.31 5 -
0.2851196670135276 8 San Bernardino Valley 39 39 123 3.88 14 -
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 33 46 1.67 20 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.4132047477744807 1 Palomar 46 1096 829 235 32 12 .971
0.32037037037037036 2 Southwestern 39 1140 729 367 44 10 .961
0.34297520661157027 3 Imperial Valley 36 870 563 271 36 5 .959
0.39761646803900325 4 San Diego Mesa 34 807 579 191 37 5 .954
0.3260437375745527 5 Mt. San Jacinto 38 799 523 206 70 6 .912
0.3086548488008342 6 Grossmont 39 1011 628 293 90 2 .911
0.29379157427937913 7 San Diego City 37 989 611 287 91 9 .908
0.2851196670135276 8 San Bernardino Valley 39 998 643 254 101 10 .899
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 870 542 229 99 28 .886
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3086548488008342 1 Grossmont 39 9 45 13 .224 -
0.2851196670135276 2 San Bernardino Valley 39 5 39 11 .220 -
0.34297520661157027 3 Imperial Valley 36 9 21 5 .192 -
0.4132047477744807 4 Palomar 46 7 24 5 .172 -
0.32037037037037036 5 Southwestern 39 14 37 7 .159 0
0.29379157427937913 6 San Diego City 37 13 52 7 .119 0
0.3260437375745527 7 Mt. San Jacinto 38 2 47 4 .078 0
0.39761646803900325 8 San Diego Mesa 34 2 24 2 .077 -
0.27757125154894674 9 Desert 33 10 77 6 .072 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.32037037037037036 1 Southwestern 14.0 140,000 10,000
0.27757125154894674 2 Desert 17.0 1,326 78
0.4132047477744807 3 Palomar 20.0 1,025 51
0.29379157427937913 4 San Diego City 15.0 520 35
0.3260437375745527 5 Mt. San Jacinto 10.0 154 15
0.3086548488008342 6 Grossmont 19.0 224 12
0.2851196670135276 7 San Bernardino Valley 13.0 60 5
0.39761646803900325 8 San Diego Mesa 13.0 0 0
0.34297520661157027 9 Imperial Valley 13.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.47478991596638653 1 Palomar 16 476 226 191 46 21 .475 .521 .700
0.38004750593824227 2 San Diego Mesa 16 421 160 106 50 36 .380 .453 .546
0.33098591549295775 3 Imperial Valley 16 426 141 71 52 41 .331 .412 .420
0.30170316301703165 4 Mt. San Jacinto 16 411 124 59 33 53 .302 .367 .353
0.3273942093541203 5 Southwestern 16 449 147 83 36 30 .327 .389 .419
0.31139240506329113 6 Grossmont 16 395 123 82 46 58 .311 .396 .438
0.2857142857142857 7 San Diego City 16 413 118 52 25 48 .286 .333 .380
0.25271739130434784 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 368 93 31 35 56 .253 .321 .307
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 360 85 38 29 84 .236 .300 .294
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.47478991596638653 1 Palomar 16 48 16 9 73
0.38004750593824227 2 San Diego Mesa 16 39 2 9 50
0.31139240506329113 3 Grossmont 16 19 5 7 31
0.33098591549295775 4 Imperial Valley 16 15 10 1 26
0.2857142857142857 5 San Diego City 16 28 4 1 33
0.3273942093541203 6 Southwestern 16 24 4 3 31
0.30170316301703165 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 15 3 - 18
0.25271739130434784 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 15 1 1 17
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 14 2 1 17
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.47478991596638653 1 Palomar 16 221 333 28 2
0.38004750593824227 2 San Diego Mesa 16 113 230 2 -
0.33098591549295775 3 Imperial Valley 16 90 179 20 3
0.3273942093541203 4 Southwestern 16 97 188 8 2
0.30170316301703165 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 68 145 22 6
0.31139240506329113 6 Grossmont 16 99 173 7 3
0.25271739130434784 7 San Bernardino Valley 16 36 113 8 2
0.2857142857142857 8 San Diego City 16 63 157 18 7
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 45 106 14 8
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.47478991596638653 1 Palomar 16 9 8 3 2 92 77 1.19 542
0.3273942093541203 2 Southwestern 16 13 6 16 5 110 140 .79 520
0.33098591549295775 3 Imperial Valley 16 8 2 19 4 61 67 .91 507
0.30170316301703165 4 Mt. San Jacinto 16 12 5 16 3 76 65 1.17 477
0.31139240506329113 5 Grossmont 16 11 3 9 6 79 104 .76 464
0.25271739130434784 6 San Bernardino Valley 16 2 - 18 10 114 94 1.21 423
0.38004750593824227 7 San Diego Mesa 16 11 6 15 2 98 99 .99 503
0.2857142857142857 8 San Diego City 16 4 - 14 2 95 115 .83 456
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 4 - 7 4 106 51 2.08 400
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.2361111111111111 1 Desert 16 16 88.2 250 203 143 11.29
0.30170316301703165 2 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 102.0 149 119 81 5.56
0.31139240506329113 3 Grossmont 16 16 90.2 119 82 62 4.79
0.25271739130434784 4 San Bernardino Valley 16 16 91.0 182 117 81 6.23
0.2857142857142857 5 San Diego City 16 16 100.0 114 97 46 3.22
0.38004750593824227 6 San Diego Mesa 16 16 83.2 111 87 69 5.77
0.3273942093541203 7 Southwestern 16 16 105.1 113 41 31 2.06
0.33098591549295775 8 Imperial Valley 16 16 104.0 116 62 46 3.10
0.47478991596638653 9 Palomar 16 16 89.0 40 16 9 0.71
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
0.47478991596638653 1 Palomar 16 16 122 9.60 1 -
0.38004750593824227 2 San Diego Mesa 16 16 48 4.02 3 -
0.33098591549295775 3 Imperial Valley 16 16 54 3.63 4 -
0.30170316301703165 4 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 41 2.81 7 -
0.3273942093541203 5 Southwestern 16 16 35 2.33 - -
0.31139240506329113 6 Grossmont 16 16 32 2.47 3 -
0.2857142857142857 7 San Diego City 16 16 53 3.71 2 -
0.25271739130434784 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 16 28 2.15 2 -
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 16 11 .87 9 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.47478991596638653 1 Palomar 16 346 261 77 8 3 .977
0.3273942093541203 2 Southwestern 16 519 316 186 17 1 .967
0.33098591549295775 3 Imperial Valley 16 411 262 133 16 5 .961
0.38004750593824227 4 San Diego Mesa 16 352 262 72 18 - .949
0.30170316301703165 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 350 230 81 39 1 .889
0.31139240506329113 6 Grossmont 16 435 268 139 28 1 .936
0.2857142857142857 7 San Diego City 16 487 294 151 42 6 .914
0.25271739130434784 8 San Bernardino Valley 16 464 293 118 53 4 .886
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 402 244 106 52 9 .871
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.31139240506329113 1 Grossmont 16 3 11 3 .214 -
0.25271739130434784 2 San Bernardino Valley 16 4 12 5 .294 -
0.33098591549295775 3 Imperial Valley 16 8 7 2 .222 -
0.47478991596638653 4 Palomar 16 1 1 1 .500 -
0.3273942093541203 5 Southwestern 16 6 6 4 .400 -
0.2857142857142857 6 San Diego City 16 8 19 3 .136 -
0.30170316301703165 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 2 20 3 .130 -
0.38004750593824227 8 San Diego Mesa 16 1 9 1 .100 -
0.2361111111111111 9 Desert 16 5 42 5 .106 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.3273942093541203 1 Southwestern 8.0 80,000 10,000
0.2361111111111111 2 Desert 8.0 624 78
0.47478991596638653 3 Palomar 8.0 400 50
0.2857142857142857 4 San Diego City 8.0 270 34
0.30170316301703165 5 Mt. San Jacinto 8.0 154 19
0.31139240506329113 6 Grossmont 8.0 0 0
0.25271739130434784 7 San Bernardino Valley 8.0 60 8
0.38004750593824227 8 San Diego Mesa 8.0 0 0
0.33098591549295775 9 Imperial Valley 8.0 0 0