Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.38823529411764707 1 Palomar 42 1275 495 313 94 67 .388 .438 .566
0.341688654353562 2 Imperial Valley 27 758 259 118 77 78 .342 .402 .446
0.3396584440227704 3 Southwestern 39 1054 358 175 77 113 .340 .393 .436
0.32560296846011133 4 Grossmont 39 1078 351 159 90 114 .326 .379 .434
0.32053941908713696 5 San Bernardino 34 964 309 155 85 98 .321 .384 .400
0.30440587449933243 6 San Diego Mesa 31 749 228 124 75 84 .304 .384 .409
0.28431372549019607 7 Mt. San Jacinto 33 816 232 128 60 134 .284 .343 .379
0.23557692307692307 8 Desert 29 624 147 59 48 129 .236 .304 .309
0.22876712328767124 9 San Diego City 34 730 167 67 52 139 .229 .294 .281
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
142.0 1 Palomar 42 92 15 35 142
83.0 2 Grossmont 39 58 16 9 83
70.0 3 Southwestern 39 49 10 11 70
63.0 4 San Bernardino 34 54 4 5 63
54.0 5 Imperial Valley 27 32 19 3 54
52.0 6 Mt. San Jacinto 33 34 11 7 52
52.0 6 San Diego Mesa 31 30 18 4 52
37.0 8 Desert 29 29 7 1 37
31.0 9 San Diego City 34 25 5 1 31
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
349.0 1 Palomar 42 349 722 76 4
203.0 2 Southwestern 39 203 460 60 2
197.0 3 Grossmont 39 197 468 36 5
181.0 4 San Bernardino 34 181 386 13 5
165.0 5 Mt. San Jacinto 33 165 309 68 10
158.0 6 Imperial Valley 27 158 338 27 2
147.0 7 San Diego Mesa 31 147 306 19 12
89.0 8 San Diego City 34 89 205 40 9
79.0 9 Desert 29 79 193 22 7
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1433.0 1 Palomar 42 27 11 26 13 178 188 .95 1433
1208.0 2 Southwestern 39 20 7 50 7 291 272 1.07 1208
1206.0 3 Grossmont 39 6 4 28 10 197 241 .82 1206
1103.0 4 San Bernardino 34 17 5 32 13 175 184 .95 1103
924.0 5 Mt. San Jacinto 33 15 4 29 3 123 97 1.27 924
890.0 6 Imperial Valley 27 10 15 30 9 69 72 .96 890
888.0 7 San Diego Mesa 31 26 6 32 5 212 171 1.24 888
826.0 8 San Diego City 34 17 4 23 12 191 154 1.24 826
704.0 9 Desert 29 14 2 16 7 180 124 1.45 704
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
8.462025316455696 1 Desert 29 29 158.0 335 271 191 8.46
7.195804195804195 2 San Diego City 34 34 190.2 410 320 196 7.20
5.121951219512195 3 Mt. San Jacinto 33 33 191.1 243 197 140 5.12
5.043010752688172 4 San Diego Mesa 31 31 186.0 265 181 134 5.04
3.6410256410256414 5 Palomar 42 42 273.0 263 186 142 3.64
3.4273858921161824 6 Grossmont 39 39 241.0 319 158 118 3.43
2.805668016194332 7 Southwestern 39 39 247.0 240 128 99 2.81
2.7979041916167664 8 San Bernardino 34 34 222.2 244 139 89 2.80
2.1611650485436895 9 Imperial Valley 27 27 171.2 171 89 53 2.16
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Desert 29 29 43 1.91 11 -
- 2 Grossmont 39 39 63 1.83 10 -
- 2 Imperial Valley 27 27 133 5.42 - -
- 2 Mt. San Jacinto 33 33 79 2.89 6 -
- 2 Palomar 42 42 221 5.67 10 -
- 2 San Bernardino 34 34 192 6.04 6 -
- 2 San Diego City 34 34 39 1.43 11 -
- 2 San Diego Mesa 31 31 72 2.71 19 -
- 2 Southwestern 39 39 194 5.50 10 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9631425800193987 1 Southwestern 39 1031 734 259 38 8 .963
0.9561101549053356 2 Palomar 42 1162 798 313 51 12 .956
0.9541420118343196 3 Imperial Valley 27 676 430 215 31 10 .954
0.9375 4 Grossmont 39 1088 692 328 68 3 .938
0.9361702127659575 5 Mt. San Jacinto 33 893 559 277 57 16 .936
0.9279187817258884 6 San Bernardino 34 985 630 284 71 10 .928
0.9102272727272728 7 San Diego Mesa 31 880 551 250 79 1 .910
0.8922237380627558 8 Desert 29 733 471 183 79 9 .892
0.8897379912663755 9 San Diego City 34 916 552 263 101 6 .890
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.25 1 San Bernardino 34 5 21 7 .250 0
0.24390243902439024 2 Grossmont 39 13 31 10 .244 -
0.17142857142857143 3 San Diego Mesa 31 2 29 6 .171 -
0.14634146341463414 4 Palomar 42 11 35 6 .146 -
0.1111111111111111 5 Desert 29 9 48 6 .111 1
0.07894736842105263 6 Southwestern 39 9 35 3 .079 1
0.075 7 Mt. San Jacinto 33 6 37 3 .075 0
0.03571428571428571 8 San Diego City 34 9 81 3 .036 0
0.0 9 Imperial Valley 27 2 17 0 .000 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
497.22222222222223 1 Southwestern 18.0 8,950 497
78.0 2 Desert 15.0 1,170 78
57.0 3 Palomar 20.0 1,130 57
50.0 4 San Diego City 14.0 700 50
19.642857142857142 5 Mt. San Jacinto 14.0 275 20
6.0 6 Grossmont 17.0 99 6
2.7777777777777777 7 San Diego Mesa 18.0 50 3
2.0 8 San Bernardino 14.0 20 2
0.0 9 Imperial Valley 12.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.42217484008528783 1 Palomar 16 469 198 136 39 23 .422 .469 .606
0.34408602150537637 2 Imperial Valley 16 465 160 68 38 61 .344 .390 .456
0.32019704433497537 3 Southwestern 16 406 130 68 28 50 .320 .373 .401
0.3259423503325942 4 Grossmont 16 451 147 76 37 46 .326 .377 .446
0.28982300884955753 5 San Bernardino 16 452 131 48 36 51 .290 .345 .363
0.29850746268656714 6 San Diego Mesa 16 402 120 68 31 46 .299 .367 .391
0.2650918635170604 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 381 101 53 21 63 .265 .312 .370
0.2361111111111111 8 Desert 16 360 85 34 25 64 .236 .299 .311
0.22686567164179106 9 San Diego City 16 335 76 23 21 67 .227 .285 .269
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
53.0 1 Palomar 16 32 9 12 53
37.0 2 Grossmont 16 24 9 4 37
24.0 3 Southwestern 16 18 3 3 24
28.0 4 San Bernardino 16 25 1 2 28
34.0 5 Imperial Valley 16 19 12 3 34
26.0 6 Mt. San Jacinto 16 15 8 3 26
27.0 7 San Diego Mesa 16 17 10 - 27
20.0 8 Desert 16 14 5 1 20
13.0 9 San Diego City 16 12 1 - 13
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
159.0 1 Palomar 16 159 284 34 3
89.0 2 Southwestern 16 89 163 24 2
97.0 3 Grossmont 16 97 201 16 -
64.0 4 San Bernardino 16 64 164 6 1
63.0 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 63 141 28 5
93.0 6 Imperial Valley 16 93 212 19 -
80.0 7 San Diego Mesa 16 80 157 7 6
28.0 8 San Diego City 16 28 90 9 6
46.0 9 Desert 16 46 112 6 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
522.0 1 Palomar 16 4 2 8 3 42 55 .76 522
471.0 2 Southwestern 16 8 3 26 3 112 89 1.26 471
509.0 3 Grossmont 16 2 3 16 3 80 96 .83 509
513.0 4 San Bernardino 16 3 2 20 7 95 96 .99 513
425.0 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 6 2 15 3 56 50 1.12 425
544.0 6 Imperial Valley 16 6 14 21 7 53 56 .95 544
468.0 7 San Diego Mesa 16 13 1 21 - 99 91 1.09 468
379.0 8 San Diego City 16 6 - 17 6 85 72 1.18 379
403.0 9 Desert 16 8 2 8 - 98 69 1.42 403
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
7.482758620689655 1 Desert 16 16 87.0 175 136 93 7.48
7.026315789473683 2 San Diego City 16 16 88.2 187 139 89 7.03
6.239130434782608 3 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 92.0 145 118 82 6.24
3.6585365853658534 4 San Diego Mesa 16 16 95.2 117 68 50 3.66
0.7368421052631579 5 Palomar 16 16 95.0 62 23 10 0.74
2.2871287128712874 6 Grossmont 16 16 101.0 117 48 33 2.29
2.225165562913907 7 Southwestern 16 16 100.2 85 42 32 2.23
3.312302839116719 8 San Bernardino 16 16 105.2 135 72 50 3.31
2.0165562913907285 9 Imperial Valley 16 16 100.2 109 61 29 2.02
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
$value 1 Desert 16 16 21 1.69 5 -
- 2 Grossmont 16 16 25 1.73 2 -
- 2 Imperial Valley 16 16 69 4.80 - -
- 2 Mt. San Jacinto 16 16 31 2.36 3 -
- 2 Palomar 16 16 98 7.22 1 -
- 2 San Bernardino 16 16 76 5.03 4 -
- 2 San Diego City 16 16 15 1.18 4 -
- 2 San Diego Mesa 16 16 32 2.34 6 -
- 2 Southwestern 16 16 88 6.12 2 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9727722772277227 1 Southwestern 16 404 295 98 11 2 .973
0.9512195121951219 2 Palomar 16 410 285 105 20 6 .951
0.9363636363636364 3 Imperial Valley 16 440 277 135 28 6 .936
0.927400468384075 4 Grossmont 16 427 270 126 31 2 .927
0.9225352112676056 5 Mt. San Jacinto 16 426 261 132 33 5 .923
0.920303605313093 6 San Bernardino 16 527 330 155 42 7 .920
0.9196428571428571 7 San Diego Mesa 16 448 282 130 36 - .920
0.8913043478260869 8 Desert 16 414 258 111 45 6 .891
0.8800959232613909 9 San Diego City 16 417 250 117 50 1 .880
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.17647058823529413 1 San Bernardino 16 2 14 3 .176 -
0.08333333333333333 2 Grossmont 16 7 11 1 .083 -
0.1 3 San Diego Mesa 16 2 9 1 .100 -
0.1 3 Palomar 16 4 9 1 .100 -
0.1 3 Desert 16 5 27 3 .100 -
0.1 3 Southwestern 16 3 9 1 .100 1
0.0 7 Mt. San Jacinto 16 2 19 0 .000 -
0.022727272727272728 8 San Diego City 16 5 43 1 .023 -
0.0 9 Imperial Valley 16 2 8 0 .000 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
456.25 1 Southwestern 8.0 3,650 456
78.0 2 Desert 8.0 624 78
46.0 3 Palomar 8.0 363 46
53.75 4 San Diego City 8.0 430 54
15.625 5 Mt. San Jacinto 8.0 125 16
13.0 6 Grossmont 8.0 99 13
0.0 7 San Diego Mesa 8.0 0 0
3.0 8 San Bernardino 8.0 20 3
0.0 9 Imperial Valley 8.0 0 0