Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
252.0 1 Sequoias 37 1015 318 149 86 95 .313 .379 .382
259.0 2 Taft 39 1106 343 184 64 101 .310 .364 .401
233.2 3 Fresno City 37 992 305 189 107 108 .307 .382 .453
245.1 4 Merced 37 1030 306 157 79 92 .297 .358 .401
199.1 5 Porterville 32 849 225 107 111 132 .265 .366 .338
230.2 6 Reedley 37 969 238 131 76 142 .246 .316 .334
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 778 178 83 78 114 .229 .313 .276
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 164 35 16 17 25 .213 .291 .274
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
233.2 1 Fresno City 37 72 6 20 98
259.0 2 Taft 39 55 5 12 72
245.1 3 Merced 37 46 11 13 70
230.2 4 Reedley 37 34 11 10 55
252.0 5 Sequoias 37 42 8 4 54
199.1 6 Porterville 32 43 5 3 51
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 20 4 3 27
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 6 2 0 8
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
233.2 1 Fresno City 37 225 449 52 5
259.0 2 Taft 39 223 444 71 8
252.0 3 Sequoias 37 200 388 68 6
245.1 4 Merced 37 190 413 27 7
230.2 5 Reedley 37 161 324 34 11
199.1 6 Porterville 32 126 287 9 4
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 104 215 3 2
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 18 45 5 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
259.0 1 Taft 39 37 14 33 1 56 26 2.15 1254
252.0 2 Sequoias 37 27 8 59 3 225 163 1.38 1195
233.2 3 Fresno City 37 16 6 34 4 106 101 1.05 1155
245.1 4 Merced 37 24 8 12 11 231 269 .86 1153
230.2 5 Reedley 37 28 10 27 18 163 118 1.38 1110
199.1 6 Porterville 32 28 7 21 6 103 90 1.14 1016
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 18 1 25 1 64 34 1.88 900
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 1 0 4 3 42 37 1.14 186
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
259.0 1 Taft 39 39 259.0 296 191 127 3.43
252.0 2 Sequoias 37 37 252.0 257 162 91 2.53
245.1 3 Merced 37 37 245.1 219 136 90 2.57
233.2 4 Fresno City 37 37 233.2 321 189 148 4.43
230.2 5 Reedley 37 37 230.2 294 204 131 3.98
199.1 6 Porterville 32 32 199.1 303 191 137 4.81
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 32 189.2 327 214 157 5.79
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 8 43.0 99 93 57 9.28
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
43.0 1 Cerro Coso 8 8 36 5.86 3 2.70
189.2 2 Coalinga 32 32 58 2.14 15 2.00
199.1 3 Porterville 32 32 69 2.42 2 1.84
233.2 4 Fresno City 37 37 69 2.07 30 1.73
230.2 5 Reedley 37 37 45 1.37 11 1.67
259.0 6 Taft 39 39 85 2.30 17 1.52
252.0 7 Sequoias 37 37 133 3.69 11 1.39
245.1 8 Merced 37 37 220 6.28 7 1.26
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
233.2 1 Fresno City 37 1120 704 361 55 3 .951
230.2 2 Reedley 37 892 547 289 56 12 .937
245.1 3 Merced 37 1060 734 257 69 11 .935
259.0 4 Taft 39 1228 763 381 84 17 .932
252.0 5 Sequoias 37 1182 738 346 98 13 .917
199.1 6 Porterville 32 887 565 247 75 14 .915
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 789 528 193 68 28 .914
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 224 129 57 38 4 .830
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
233.2 1 Fresno City 37 17 21 8 .276 2
259.0 2 Taft 39 19 39 13 .250 0
43.0 3 Cerro Coso 8 3 6 2 .250 0
245.1 4 Merced 37 10 35 8 .186 0
252.0 5 Sequoias 37 6 38 6 .136 0
230.2 6 Reedley 37 10 44 4 .083 0
189.2 7 Coalinga 32 14 44 4 .083 0
199.1 8 Porterville 32 9 54 2 .036 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
230.2 1 Reedley 14.0 735 53
252.0 2 Sequoias 24.0 900 38
233.2 3 Fresno City 18.0 50 3
259.0 4 Taft 16.0 - -
245.1 5 Merced 20.0 0 0
199.1 6 Porterville 8.0 0 0
189.2 7 Coalinga 15.0 0 0
43.0 8 Cerro Coso 5.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
125.0 1 Sequoias 18 519 172 77 36 30 .331 .389 .401
123.0 2 Taft 18 538 182 94 37 48 .338 .397 .442
116.2 3 Fresno City 18 487 144 82 45 48 .296 .359 .439
129.1 4 Merced 20 553 170 90 32 39 .307 .351 .438
114.2 5 Porterville 18 478 128 57 58 72 .268 .356 .351
116.2 6 Reedley 19 511 137 79 36 69 .268 .329 .378
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 480 121 65 48 52 .252 .332 .298
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 113 20 2 4 17 .177 .212 .230
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
116.2 1 Fresno City 18 37 3 9 49
123.0 2 Taft 18 25 2 9 36
129.1 3 Merced 20 27 6 11 44
116.2 4 Reedley 19 19 5 9 33
125.0 5 Sequoias 18 27 3 1 31
114.2 6 Porterville 18 25 3 3 31
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 12 2 2 16
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 4 1 0 5
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
116.2 1 Fresno City 18 98 214 28 1
123.0 2 Taft 18 118 238 41 7
125.0 3 Sequoias 18 99 208 32 3
129.1 4 Merced 20 104 242 15 5
116.2 5 Reedley 19 97 193 14 6
114.2 6 Porterville 18 67 168 2 1
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 79 143 2 2
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 3 26 1 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
123.0 1 Taft 18 21 8 18 - 0 - - 622
125.0 2 Sequoias 18 15 4 32 - 110 87 1.26 606
116.2 3 Fresno City 18 5 3 20 4 65 65 1.00 560
129.1 4 Merced 20 7 3 7 6 110 133 .83 602
116.2 5 Reedley 19 14 7 17 14 63 66 .95 585
114.2 6 Porterville 18 10 4 11 2 38 32 1.19 561
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 10 1 12 - 20 13 1.54 551
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 1 0 1 1 29 21 1.38 119
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
123.0 1 Taft 18 18 123.0 115 65 40 2.28
125.0 2 Sequoias 18 18 125.0 119 72 39 2.18
129.1 3 Merced 20 20 129.1 98 46 37 2.00
116.2 4 Fresno City 18 18 116.2 154 79 57 3.42
116.2 4 Reedley 19 19 116.2 155 110 74 4.44
114.2 6 Porterville 18 18 114.2 180 106 74 4.52
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 19 113.1 181 115 76 4.69
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 6 29.0 70 72 38 9.17
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
29.0 1 Cerro Coso 6 6 21 5.07 3 2.76
113.1 2 Coalinga 19 19 40 2.47 7 1.90
114.2 3 Porterville 18 18 29 1.77 2 1.87
116.2 4 Fresno City 18 18 28 1.68 12 1.65
116.2 4 Reedley 19 19 25 1.50 5 1.76
123.0 6 Taft 18 18 41 2.33 6 1.23
125.0 7 Sequoias 18 18 72 4.03 5 1.38
129.1 8 Merced 20 20 120 6.49 2 1.09
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
116.2 1 Fresno City 18 553 350 175 28 2 .949
116.2 1 Reedley 19 492 293 164 35 6 .929
129.1 3 Merced 20 532 388 119 25 7 .953
123.0 4 Taft 18 575 368 170 37 2 .936
125.0 5 Sequoias 18 591 375 166 50 5 .915
114.2 6 Porterville 18 472 305 125 42 7 .911
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 459 310 106 43 16 .906
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 158 87 39 32 3 .797
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
116.2 1 Fresno City 18 8 10 4 .286 1
123.0 2 Taft 18 10 11 2 .154 0
29.0 3 Cerro Coso 6 3 1 1 .500 0
129.1 4 Merced 20 7 13 1 .071 0
125.0 5 Sequoias 18 4 14 6 .300 0
116.2 6 Reedley 19 6 21 3 .125 0
113.1 7 Coalinga 19 10 32 3 .086 0
114.2 8 Porterville 18 8 31 1 .031 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
116.2 1 Reedley 10.0 385 39
125.0 2 Sequoias 10.0 400 40
116.2 3 Fresno City 8.0 50 7
123.0 4 Taft 8.0 - -
129.1 5 Merced 10.0 0 0
114.2 6 Porterville 7.0 0 0
113.1 7 Coalinga 11.0 - -
29.0 8 Cerro Coso 4.0 0 0