Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
27.0 1 Sequoias 37 1015 318 149 86 95 .313 .379 .382
37.0 2 Taft 39 1106 343 184 64 101 .310 .364 .401
16.0 3 Fresno City 37 992 305 189 107 108 .307 .382 .453
24.0 4 Merced 37 1030 306 157 79 92 .297 .358 .401
28.0 5 Porterville 32 849 225 107 111 132 .265 .366 .338
28.0 5 Reedley 37 969 238 131 76 142 .246 .316 .334
18.0 7 Coalinga 32 778 178 83 78 114 .229 .313 .276
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 164 35 16 17 25 .213 .291 .274
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
16.0 1 Fresno City 37 72 6 20 98
37.0 2 Taft 39 55 5 12 72
24.0 3 Merced 37 46 11 13 70
28.0 4 Reedley 37 34 11 10 55
27.0 5 Sequoias 37 42 8 4 54
28.0 6 Porterville 32 43 5 3 51
18.0 7 Coalinga 32 20 4 3 27
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 6 2 0 8
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
16.0 1 Fresno City 37 225 449 52 5
37.0 2 Taft 39 223 444 71 8
27.0 3 Sequoias 37 200 388 68 6
24.0 4 Merced 37 190 413 27 7
28.0 5 Reedley 37 161 324 34 11
28.0 5 Porterville 32 126 287 9 4
18.0 7 Coalinga 32 104 215 3 2
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 18 45 5 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
37.0 1 Taft 39 37 14 33 1 56 26 2.15 1254
28.0 2 Porterville 32 28 7 21 6 103 90 1.14 1016
28.0 2 Reedley 37 28 10 27 18 163 118 1.38 1110
27.0 4 Sequoias 37 27 8 59 3 225 163 1.38 1195
24.0 5 Merced 37 24 8 12 11 231 269 .86 1153
18.0 6 Coalinga 32 18 1 25 1 64 34 1.88 900
16.0 7 Fresno City 37 16 6 34 4 106 101 1.05 1155
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 1 0 4 3 42 37 1.14 186
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.0 1 Cerro Coso 8 8 43.0 99 93 57 9.28
18.0 2 Coalinga 32 32 189.2 327 214 157 5.79
28.0 3 Porterville 32 32 199.1 303 191 137 4.81
16.0 4 Fresno City 37 37 233.2 321 189 148 4.43
28.0 5 Reedley 37 37 230.2 294 204 131 3.98
37.0 6 Taft 39 39 259.0 296 191 127 3.43
24.0 7 Merced 37 37 245.1 219 136 90 2.57
27.0 8 Sequoias 37 37 252.0 257 162 91 2.53
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
1.0 1 Cerro Coso 8 8 36 5.86 3 2.70
18.0 2 Coalinga 32 32 58 2.14 15 2.00
28.0 3 Porterville 32 32 69 2.42 2 1.84
16.0 4 Fresno City 37 37 69 2.07 30 1.73
28.0 5 Reedley 37 37 45 1.37 11 1.67
37.0 6 Taft 39 39 85 2.30 17 1.52
27.0 7 Sequoias 37 37 133 3.69 11 1.39
24.0 8 Merced 37 37 220 6.28 7 1.26
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
16.0 1 Fresno City 37 1120 704 361 55 3 .951
28.0 2 Reedley 37 892 547 289 56 12 .937
24.0 3 Merced 37 1060 734 257 69 11 .935
37.0 4 Taft 39 1228 763 381 84 17 .932
27.0 5 Sequoias 37 1182 738 346 98 13 .917
28.0 6 Porterville 32 887 565 247 75 14 .915
18.0 7 Coalinga 32 789 528 193 68 28 .914
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 8 224 129 57 38 4 .830
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
16.0 1 Fresno City 37 17 21 8 .276 2
37.0 2 Taft 39 19 39 13 .250 0
1.0 3 Cerro Coso 8 3 6 2 .250 0
24.0 4 Merced 37 10 35 8 .186 0
27.0 5 Sequoias 37 6 38 6 .136 0
28.0 6 Reedley 37 10 44 4 .083 0
18.0 7 Coalinga 32 14 44 4 .083 0
28.0 8 Porterville 32 9 54 2 .036 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
28.0 1 Reedley 14.0 735 53
27.0 2 Sequoias 24.0 900 38
16.0 3 Fresno City 18.0 50 3
37.0 4 Taft 16.0 - -
28.0 5 Porterville 8.0 0 0
24.0 6 Merced 20.0 0 0
18.0 7 Coalinga 15.0 0 0
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 5.0 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
15.0 1 Sequoias 18 519 172 77 36 30 .331 .389 .401
21.0 2 Taft 18 538 182 94 37 48 .338 .397 .442
5.0 3 Fresno City 18 487 144 82 45 48 .296 .359 .439
7.0 4 Merced 20 553 170 90 32 39 .307 .351 .438
10.0 5 Porterville 18 478 128 57 58 72 .268 .356 .351
14.0 6 Reedley 19 511 137 79 36 69 .268 .329 .378
10.0 7 Coalinga 19 480 121 65 48 52 .252 .332 .298
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 113 20 2 4 17 .177 .212 .230
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
5.0 1 Fresno City 18 37 3 9 49
21.0 2 Taft 18 25 2 9 36
7.0 3 Merced 20 27 6 11 44
14.0 4 Reedley 19 19 5 9 33
15.0 5 Sequoias 18 27 3 1 31
10.0 6 Porterville 18 25 3 3 31
10.0 6 Coalinga 19 12 2 2 16
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 4 1 0 5
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
5.0 1 Fresno City 18 98 214 28 1
21.0 2 Taft 18 118 238 41 7
15.0 3 Sequoias 18 99 208 32 3
7.0 4 Merced 20 104 242 15 5
14.0 5 Reedley 19 97 193 14 6
10.0 6 Porterville 18 67 168 2 1
10.0 6 Coalinga 19 79 143 2 2
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 3 26 1 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
21.0 1 Taft 18 21 8 18 - 0 - - 622
10.0 2 Porterville 18 10 4 11 2 38 32 1.19 561
14.0 3 Reedley 19 14 7 17 14 63 66 .95 585
15.0 4 Sequoias 18 15 4 32 - 110 87 1.26 606
7.0 5 Merced 20 7 3 7 6 110 133 .83 602
10.0 6 Coalinga 19 10 1 12 - 20 13 1.54 551
5.0 7 Fresno City 18 5 3 20 4 65 65 1.00 560
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 1 0 1 1 29 21 1.38 119
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
1.0 1 Cerro Coso 6 6 29.0 70 72 38 9.17
10.0 2 Coalinga 19 19 113.1 181 115 76 4.69
10.0 2 Porterville 18 18 114.2 180 106 74 4.52
5.0 4 Fresno City 18 18 116.2 154 79 57 3.42
14.0 5 Reedley 19 19 116.2 155 110 74 4.44
21.0 6 Taft 18 18 123.0 115 65 40 2.28
7.0 7 Merced 20 20 129.1 98 46 37 2.00
15.0 8 Sequoias 18 18 125.0 119 72 39 2.18
Rk Team app gs k k/7 hr whip
1.0 1 Cerro Coso 6 6 21 5.07 3 2.76
10.0 2 Coalinga 19 19 40 2.47 7 1.90
10.0 2 Porterville 18 18 29 1.77 2 1.87
5.0 4 Fresno City 18 18 28 1.68 12 1.65
14.0 5 Reedley 19 19 25 1.50 5 1.76
21.0 6 Taft 18 18 41 2.33 6 1.23
15.0 7 Sequoias 18 18 72 4.03 5 1.38
7.0 8 Merced 20 20 120 6.49 2 1.09
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
5.0 1 Fresno City 18 553 350 175 28 2 .949
14.0 2 Reedley 19 492 293 164 35 6 .929
7.0 3 Merced 20 532 388 119 25 7 .953
21.0 4 Taft 18 575 368 170 37 2 .936
15.0 5 Sequoias 18 591 375 166 50 5 .915
10.0 6 Porterville 18 472 305 125 42 7 .911
10.0 6 Coalinga 19 459 310 106 43 16 .906
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 6 158 87 39 32 3 .797
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
5.0 1 Fresno City 18 8 10 4 .286 1
21.0 2 Taft 18 10 11 2 .154 0
1.0 3 Cerro Coso 6 3 1 1 .500 0
7.0 4 Merced 20 7 13 1 .071 0
15.0 5 Sequoias 18 4 14 6 .300 0
14.0 6 Reedley 19 6 21 3 .125 0
10.0 7 Coalinga 19 10 32 3 .086 0
10.0 7 Porterville 18 8 31 1 .031 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
14.0 1 Reedley 10.0 385 39
15.0 2 Sequoias 10.0 400 40
5.0 3 Fresno City 8.0 50 7
21.0 4 Taft 8.0 - -
10.0 5 Porterville 7.0 0 0
7.0 6 Merced 10.0 0 0
10.0 7 Coalinga 11.0 - -
1.0 8 Cerro Coso 4.0 0 0