Rk Name gp ab r h 2b 3b hr rbi bb k sb cs avg obp slg
1 Sequoias 63 1715 333 531 66 13 8 247 143 161 116 10 .310 .376 .377
2 Taft 64 1808 356 549 94 8 20 290 98 175 107 12 .304 .357 .398
3 Fresno City 64 1706 380 518 126 10 36 323 172 184 87 8 .304 .375 .453
4 Merced 64 1779 313 517 72 21 23 260 141 165 48 13 .291 .355 .393
5 Porterville 53 1415 212 380 74 10 5 185 182 222 13 6 .269 .366 .346
6 Reedley 67 1755 294 433 64 18 19 244 135 269 64 17 .247 .317 .336
7 West Hills Coalinga 54 1312 171 297 36 7 5 135 128 195 6 3 .226 .308 .276
8 Cerro Coso 14 287 31 64 12 3 0 28 27 41 7 4 .223 .294 .286
Rk Name gp hbp sf sh tb xbh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1 Sequoias 63 49 14 91 647 87 6 377 271 1.39 2012
2 Taft 64 65 21 54 719 122 2 95 40 2.38 2046
3 Fresno City 64 29 12 56 772 172 5 188 173 1.09 1975
4 Merced 64 46 15 19 700 116 20 397 468 .85 2000
5 Porterville 53 41 10 31 489 89 8 159 145 1.10 1679
6 Reedley 67 54 17 51 590 101 31 301 230 1.31 2012
7 West Hills Coalinga 54 27 2 44 362 48 1 120 65 1.85 1513
8 Cerro Coso 14 2 0 8 82 15 6 73 59 1.24 324
Rk Name gp ip h r er bb k k/7 hr era
1 Sequoias 63 426.0 437 277 157 147 225 3.70 21 2.58
2 Taft 64 428.0 500 315 213 158 139 2.27 31 3.48
3 Fresno City 64 400.2 553 323 256 141 115 2.01 55 4.47
4 Merced 64 427.2 391 240 163 144 377 6.17 14 2.67
5 Porterville 53 329.2 488 309 222 106 107 2.27 4 4.71
6 Reedley 67 419.1 515 348 222 166 81 1.35 21 3.71
7 West Hills Coalinga 54 320.0 529 346 264 89 97 2.12 24 5.77
8 Cerro Coso 14 75.0 161 158 95 33 63 5.88 6 8.87
Rk Name gp tc po a e fpct dp sba rcs rcs% pb ci
1 Sequoias 63 1999 1247 585 167 .916 8 66 9 .120 18 0
2 Taft 64 2014 1257 626 131 .935 34 69 24 .258 29 0
3 Fresno City 64 1934 1208 633 93 .952 30 36 13 .265 5 3
4 Merced 64 1856 1279 451 126 .932 16 59 13 .181 19 0
5 Porterville 53 1431 924 386 121 .915 18 85 4 .045 21 0
6 Reedley 67 1610 987 525 98 .939 16 68 7 .093 19 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 54 1341 899 341 101 .925 23 70 7 .091 47 0
8 Cerro Coso 14 394 225 101 68 .827 5 7 4 .364 7 0
Rk Name gp ab r h 2b 3b hr rbi bb k sb cs avg obp slg
1 Sequoias 29 822 154 273 40 4 2 121 53 43 47 5 .332 .388 .398
2 Taft 28 839 179 276 40 2 15 141 57 82 54 11 .329 .392 .435
3 Fresno City 30 803 156 231 60 5 15 132 69 76 43 2 .288 .348 .431
4 Merced 34 931 159 274 39 11 19 140 58 67 25 9 .294 .343 .421
5 Porterville 29 776 113 214 42 6 5 97 93 111 3 2 .276 .361 .365
6 Reedley 33 877 167 237 34 6 17 141 56 129 24 8 .270 .329 .381
7 West Hills Coalinga 30 768 127 196 20 3 3 105 76 85 4 3 .255 .332 .301
8 Cerro Coso 11 210 6 39 8 2 0 4 8 29 2 2 .186 .223 .243
Rk Name gp hbp sf sh tb xbh hdp go fo go/fo pa
1 Sequoias 29 26 7 48 327 46 - 166 139 1.19 956
2 Taft 28 36 10 29 365 57 - 0 - - 971
3 Fresno City 30 9 6 32 346 80 5 106 101 1.05 919
4 Merced 34 14 5 10 392 69 11 194 220 .88 1018
5 Porterville 29 14 7 17 283 53 2 55 49 1.12 907
6 Reedley 33 26 11 32 334 57 24 114 127 .90 1002
7 West Hills Coalinga 30 13 2 21 231 26 - 40 26 1.54 880
8 Cerro Coso 11 2 0 2 51 10 2 53 37 1.43 222
Rk Name gp ip h r er bb k k/7 hr era
1 Sequoias 29 200.0 190 115 61 78 119 4.17 9 2.13
2 Taft 28 193.0 185 100 63 54 64 2.32 10 2.28
3 Fresno City 30 193.2 253 126 90 60 46 1.66 22 3.25
4 Merced 34 222.2 178 84 67 64 201 6.32 4 2.11
5 Porterville 29 186.1 279 161 113 58 44 1.65 4 4.25
6 Reedley 33 201.1 261 178 121 88 43 1.50 9 4.21
7 West Hills Coalinga 30 180.1 263 164 112 54 64 2.48 8 4.35
8 Cerro Coso 11 54.0 127 133 72 20 41 5.31 6 9.33
Rk Name gp tc po a e fpct dp sba rcs rcs% pb ci
1 Sequoias 29 946 600 266 80 .915 5 22 9 .290 7 0
2 Taft 28 897 577 267 53 .941 17 18 4 .182 3 0
3 Fresno City 30 925 581 300 44 .952 16 15 6 .286 3 1
4 Merced 34 920 668 206 46 .950 11 23 2 .080 12 0
5 Porterville 29 733 481 189 63 .914 16 44 2 .043 9 0
6 Reedley 33 854 508 286 60 .930 10 26 5 .161 8 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 30 739 502 179 58 .922 16 51 5 .089 28 0
8 Cerro Coso 11 296 162 75 59 .801 5 1 2 .667 6 0

View: Mobile | Desktop