California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
83.56666666666666 1	Southwestern	30	929-1978	47.0	287-725	39.6	360-494	72.9	83.6
78.58620689655173 2	San Diego City	29	774-1756	44.1	225-608	37.0	506-693	73.0	78.6
76.92592592592592 3	Imperial Valley	27	734-1726	42.5	196-560	35.0	425-626	67.9	76.9
73.48148148148148 4	San Diego Mesa	27	739-1704	43.4	236-649	36.4	270-404	66.8	73.5
62.32142857142857 5	Cuyamaca	28	644-1547	41.6	153-501	30.5	302-482	62.7	62.3
58.892857142857146 6	Grossmont	28	574-1474	38.9	136-458	29.7	365-555	65.8	58.9

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
76.92592592592592 1	Imperial Valley	27	12.9	24.0	36.9	1.9
78.58620689655173 2	San Diego City	29	11.4	24.8	36.2	0.7
83.56666666666666 3	Southwestern	30	11.2	29.1	40.2	4.1
73.48148148148148 4	San Diego Mesa	27	10.4	25.1	35.5	2.3
62.32142857142857 5	Cuyamaca	28	9.3	23.3	32.6	-7.1
58.892857142857146 6	Grossmont	28	8.9	24.4	33.3	-6.3

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
58.892857142857146 1	Grossmont	28	16.8	6.5	2.3	11.0
62.32142857142857 2	Cuyamaca	28	16.3	6.9	4.8	12.8
73.48148148148148 3	San Diego Mesa	27	15.7	7.1	4.3	14.8
78.58620689655173 4	San Diego City	29	14.8	7.8	3.8	13.0
76.92592592592592 5	Imperial Valley	27	14.7	10.0	3.0	14.7
83.56666666666666 6	Southwestern	30	12.2	7.7	4.1	15.5

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
78.58620689655173 1	San Diego City	29	20.6	1.036	0.087
73.48148148148148 2	San Diego Mesa	27	15.9	0.968	-0.116
58.892857142857146 3	Grossmont	28	11.4	0.836	-0.194
83.56666666666666 4	Southwestern	30	14.4	-	-
76.92592592592592 5	Imperial Valley	27	20.4	-	-
62.32142857142857 6	Cuyamaca	28	6.6	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
76.92592592592592 1	Imperial Valley	27	685-1437	47.7	174-457	38.1	78.7
73.48148148148148 2	San Diego Mesa	27	757-1681	45.0	222-608	36.5	78.6
62.32142857142857 3	Cuyamaca	28	780-1756	44.4	232-619	37.5	75.9
58.892857142857146 4	Grossmont	28	790-1811	43.6	239-716	33.4	74.2
78.58620689655173 5	San Diego City	29	725-1680	43.2	172-528	32.6	72.7
83.56666666666666 6	Southwestern	30	765-1849	41.4	160-548	29.2	70.1

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
58.892857142857146 1	Grossmont	28	12.5	27.0	39.5	-6.3
62.32142857142857 2	Cuyamaca	28	13.5	26.2	39.7	-7.1
83.56666666666666 3	Southwestern	30	10.0	26.1	36.1	4.1
78.58620689655173 4	San Diego City	29	10.8	24.8	35.5	0.7
76.92592592592592 5	Imperial Valley	27	10.6	24.3	35.0	1.9
73.48148148148148 6	San Diego Mesa	27	11.1	22.1	33.2	2.3

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
78.58620689655173 1	San Diego City	29	17.6	8.3	4.6	11.9
76.92592592592592 2	Imperial Valley	27	15.7	7.6	3.9	15.3
83.56666666666666 3	Southwestern	30	15.2	5.5	2.6	10.8
58.892857142857146 4	Grossmont	28	13.3	10.3	3.4	16.4
62.32142857142857 5	Cuyamaca	28	12.8	7.8	3.1	15.8
73.48148148148148 6	San Diego Mesa	27	12.6	7.9	3.2	13.4

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
78.58620689655173 1	San Diego City	29	19.8	0.948	0.087
58.892857142857146 2	Grossmont	28	17.2	1.030	-0.194
76.92592592592592 3	Imperial Valley	27	15.8	-	-
62.32142857142857 4	Cuyamaca	28	15.6	-	-
83.56666666666666 5	Southwestern	30	14.7	-	-
73.48148148148148 6	San Diego Mesa	27	10.9	1.085	-0.116

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	ft	pct	pts
83.4 1	Southwestern	10	302-637	47.4	105-234	44.9	125-163	76.7	83.4
76.1 2	San Diego City	10	264-580	45.5	62-174	35.6	171-231	74.0	76.1
74.3 3	Imperial Valley	10	268-650	41.2	69-210	32.9	154-218	70.6	74.3
74.5 4	San Diego Mesa	10	280-620	45.2	75-214	35.0	110-156	70.5	74.5
60.8 5	Cuyamaca	10	224-522	42.9	54-166	32.5	106-148	71.6	60.8
62.9 6	Grossmont	10	223-546	40.8	48-159	30.2	135-199	67.8	62.9

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
74.3 1	Imperial Valley	10	14.4	20.3	34.7	-0.9
76.1 2	San Diego City	10	11.8	23.9	35.7	1.3
83.4 3	Southwestern	10	10.0	29.4	39.4	4.4
74.5 4	San Diego Mesa	10	10.5	27.9	38.4	5.4
60.8 5	Cuyamaca	10	8.6	23.5	32.1	-5.7
62.9 6	Grossmont	10	9.4	23.8	33.2	-4.5

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
62.9 1	Grossmont	10	14.4	6.4	2.6	9.9
60.8 2	Cuyamaca	10	17.7	6.1	5.7	13.0
74.5 3	San Diego Mesa	10	15.2	7.3	4.9	14.0
76.1 4	San Diego City	10	14.2	8.3	3.6	12.6
74.3 5	Imperial Valley	10	14.0	9.3	3.0	12.3
83.4 6	Southwestern	10	11.9	7.8	4.2	16.2

Rk	Team	gp	pf	off eff	net eff
76.1 1	San Diego City	10	19.4	1.058	0.147
74.5 2	San Diego Mesa	10	16.4	1.000	0.055
62.9 3	Grossmont	10	10.4	0.904	-0.120
83.4 4	Southwestern	10	11.7	-	-
74.3 5	Imperial Valley	10	19.6	-	-
60.8 6	Cuyamaca	10	2.1	-	-

Rk	Team	gp	fg	pct	3pt	pct	pts
74.3 1	Imperial Valley	10	275-545	50.5	82-183	44.8	81.2
74.5 2	San Diego Mesa	10	259-613	42.3	64-198	32.3	69.0
60.8 3	Cuyamaca	10	281-640	43.9	81-202	40.1	75.0
62.9 4	Grossmont	10	271-613	44.2	82-238	34.5	72.4
76.1 5	San Diego City	10	228-558	40.9	55-163	33.7	66.9
83.4 6	Southwestern	10	247-586	42.2	49-173	28.3	67.5

Rk	Team	gp	off	def	reb	mrgn
62.9 1	Grossmont	10	10.8	26.9	37.7	-4.5
60.8 2	Cuyamaca	10	13.2	24.6	37.8	-5.7
83.4 3	Southwestern	10	9.6	25.4	35.0	4.4
76.1 4	San Diego City	10	11.2	23.2	34.4	1.3
74.3 5	Imperial Valley	10	9.5	26.1	35.6	-0.9
74.5 6	San Diego Mesa	10	10.4	22.6	33.0	5.4

Rk	Team	gp	to	stl	blk	ast
76.1 1	San Diego City	10	18.2	8.6	4.9	9.4
74.3 2	Imperial Valley	10	15.9	7.8	5.3	16.8
83.4 3	Southwestern	10	16.8	5.0	2.2	9.3
62.9 4	Grossmont	10	13.0	8.1	3.4	15.5
60.8 5	Cuyamaca	10	10.6	8.0	4.2	16.3
74.5 6	San Diego Mesa	10	12.9	7.7	4.0	10.7

Rk	Team	gp	pf	def eff	net eff
76.1 1	San Diego City	10	18.1	0.910	0.147
62.9 2	Grossmont	10	15.8	1.025	-0.120
74.3 3	Imperial Valley	10	14.0	-	-
60.8 4	Cuyamaca	10	11.4	-	-
83.4 5	Southwestern	10	11.8	-	-
74.5 6	San Diego Mesa	10	8.5	0.945	0.055