California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.3541927409261577 1	Palomar	42	1598	566	411	217	243	.354	.450	.523
0.28930412371134023 2	Southwestern	43	1552	449	254	211	321	.289	.394	.385
0.28562259306803595 3	Grossmont	43	1558	445	296	216	293	.286	.392	.438
0.28389513108614234 4	San Diego Mesa	40	1335	379	212	167	280	.284	.387	.420
0.2822273073989321 5	San Diego City	39	1311	370	229	157	230	.282	.389	.426
0.2575387123064385 6	Imperial Valley	38	1227	316	159	134	338	.258	.354	.334

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
174.0 1	Palomar	42	116	20	38	174
142.0 2	Grossmont	43	88	12	42	142
133.0 3	San Diego Mesa	40	103	11	19	133
113.0 4	San Diego City	39	71	8	34	113
106.0 5	Southwestern	43	80	10	16	106
73.0 6	Imperial Valley	38	58	9	6	73

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
471.0 1	Palomar	42	471	836	79	19
333.0 2	Grossmont	43	333	683	30	12
293.0 3	Southwestern	43	293	597	22	8
265.0 4	San Diego City	39	265	559	43	20
231.0 5	San Diego Mesa	40	231	561	31	15
182.0 6	Imperial Valley	38	182	410	42	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1963.0 1	Palomar	42	91	35	22	19	387	401	.97	1963
1884.0 2	Grossmont	43	71	22	17	37	360	432	.83	1884
1861.0 3	Southwestern	43	65	13	20	35	380	394	.96	1861
1634.0 4	San Diego Mesa	40	72	24	36	34	333	373	.89	1634
1592.0 5	San Diego City	39	83	18	23	23	317	389	.81	1592
1463.0 6	Imperial Valley	38	58	15	29	28	318	254	1.25	1463

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
11.067961165048544 1	Imperial Valley	38	38	309.0	483	463	380	11.07
6.91907514450867 2	San Diego Mesa	40	40	346.0	431	358	266	6.92
5.732235701906412 3	Grossmont	43	43	384.2	459	289	245	5.73
4.728358208955224 4	San Diego City	39	39	335.0	353	207	176	4.73
4.365269461077844 5	Southwestern	43	43	389.2	445	254	189	4.37
3.8571428571428577 6	Palomar	42	42	373.1	339	193	160	3.86

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
$value 1	Grossmont	43	43	287	6.71	23	-
- 2	Imperial Valley	38	38	190	5.53	30	-
- 2	Palomar	42	42	375	9.04	21	-
- 2	San Diego City	39	39	311	8.36	16	-
- 2	San Diego Mesa	40	40	267	6.95	35	-
- 2	Southwestern	43	43	310	7.16	20	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.9719557195571956 1	San Diego City	39	1355	1005	312	38	8	.972
0.9671179883945842 2	Palomar	42	1551	1117	383	51	16	.967
0.9624924379915305 3	Grossmont	43	1653	1154	437	62	21	.962
0.9583081570996979 4	Southwestern	43	1655	1168	418	69	20	.958
0.9467376830892144 5	San Diego Mesa	40	1502	1038	384	80	3	.947
0.9447236180904522 6	Imperial Valley	38	1393	926	390	77	28	.945

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.2777777777777778 1	Southwestern	43	32	39	15	.278	0
0.2537313432835821 2	San Diego City	39	27	50	17	.254	0
0.225 3	San Diego Mesa	40	23	31	9	.225	0
0.21739130434782608 4	Grossmont	43	31	54	15	.217	0
0.14285714285714285 5	Palomar	42	28	30	5	.143	3
0.09473684210526316 6	Imperial Valley	38	30	86	9	.095	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
86.0 1	Southwestern	22	1,884	86
66.0 2	San Diego Mesa	20	1,320	66
49.0 3	San Diego City	20	980	49
43.0 4	Grossmont	16	685	43
23.0 5	Palomar	20	456	23
16.0 6	Imperial Valley	20	310	16

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.37166324435318276 1	Palomar	25	974	362	279	117	143	.372	.463	.569
0.28854625550660795 2	Southwestern	25	908	262	158	145	189	.289	.403	.385
0.29782608695652174 3	Grossmont	25	920	274	190	131	161	.298	.408	.485
0.28811524609843936 4	San Diego Mesa	25	833	240	148	110	156	.288	.400	.415
0.269185360094451 5	San Diego City	25	847	228	138	97	160	.269	.369	.398
0.2453066332916145 6	Imperial Valley	25	799	196	72	70	228	.245	.327	.303

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
125.0 1	Palomar	25	85	13	27	125
96.0 2	Grossmont	25	53	10	33	96
76.0 3	San Diego Mesa	25	58	6	12	76
61.0 4	San Diego City	25	36	2	23	61
60.0 5	Southwestern	25	43	6	11	60
38.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	32	4	2	38

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
316.0 1	Palomar	25	316	554	54	9
211.0 2	Grossmont	25	211	446	20	7
184.0 3	Southwestern	25	184	350	17	6
158.0 4	San Diego City	25	158	337	28	10
161.0 5	San Diego Mesa	25	161	346	23	13
83.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	83	242	30	6

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
1201.0 1	Palomar	25	71	25	14	12	231	238	.97	1201
1129.0 2	Grossmont	25	52	16	10	23	212	266	.80	1129
1111.0 3	Southwestern	25	36	9	13	15	213	239	.89	1111
1026.0 4	San Diego Mesa	25	52	11	20	22	205	244	.84	1026
1017.0 5	San Diego City	25	44	13	16	13	215	242	.89	1017
928.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	32	9	18	21	214	165	1.30	928

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
11.359223300970875 1	Imperial Valley	25	25	206.0	337	313	260	11.36
6.88479262672811 2	San Diego Mesa	25	25	217.0	279	232	166	6.88
6.013274336283186 3	Grossmont	25	25	226.0	269	177	151	6.01
5.274418604651163 4	San Diego City	25	25	215.0	245	148	126	5.27
3.6710526315789473 5	Southwestern	25	25	228.0	243	133	93	3.67
3.5112107623318387 6	Palomar	25	25	223.0	189	110	87	3.51

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
$value 1	Grossmont	25	25	163	6.49	17	-
- 2	Imperial Valley	25	25	124	5.42	22	-
- 2	Palomar	25	25	222	8.96	17	-
- 2	San Diego City	25	25	175	7.33	14	-
- 2	San Diego Mesa	25	25	164	6.80	23	-
- 2	Southwestern	25	25	189	7.46	15	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.9748283752860412 1	San Diego City	25	874	645	207	22	3	.975
0.9664864864864865 2	Palomar	25	925	666	228	31	8	.966
0.9562189054726368 3	Grossmont	25	1005	678	283	44	12	.956
0.9602446483180428 4	Southwestern	25	981	684	258	39	7	.960
0.9453781512605042 5	San Diego Mesa	25	952	651	249	52	2	.945
0.9364908503767492 6	Imperial Valley	25	929	618	252	59	16	.936

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.3055555555555556 1	Southwestern	25	18	25	11	.306	0
0.3157894736842105 2	San Diego City	25	18	26	12	.316	0
0.23333333333333334 3	San Diego Mesa	25	13	23	7	.233	0
0.3333333333333333 4	Grossmont	25	20	24	12	.333	0
0.047619047619047616 5	Palomar	25	15	20	1	.048	1
0.1 6	Imperial Valley	25	22	54	6	.100	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
80.0 1	Southwestern	13	1,036	80
73.0 2	San Diego Mesa	12	872	73
70.0 3	San Diego City	13	905	70
51.0 4	Grossmont	12	610	51
6.0 5	Palomar	11	56	6
17.0 6	Imperial Valley	14	230	17