California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
26.0 1	Reedley	46	1666	522	329	200	314	.313	.398	.444
46.0 2	Fresno City	46	1635	494	348	267	341	.302	.416	.454
15.0 3	Coalinga	37	1315	384	216	143	299	.292	.383	.384
19.0 4	Merced	43	1532	443	293	211	310	.289	.392	.386
13.0 5	Sequoias	41	1447	400	214	174	300	.276	.374	.367
21.0 6	Taft	40	1366	366	200	167	279	.268	.366	.372
6.0 7	Porterville	40	1378	361	176	178	315	.262	.367	.329

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
46.0 1	Fresno City	46	94	8	46	148
26.0 2	Reedley	46	104	18	26	148
21.0 3	Taft	40	63	8	21	92
19.0 4	Merced	43	67	12	19	98
15.0 5	Coalinga	37	60	8	15	83
13.0 6	Sequoias	41	78	7	13	98
6.0 7	Porterville	40	65	5	6	76

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
46.0 1	Fresno City	46	395	742	49	16
26.0 2	Reedley	46	383	740	28	8
19.0 3	Merced	43	348	591	51	8
13.0 4	Sequoias	41	250	531	23	17
15.0 5	Coalinga	37	242	505	77	22
21.0 6	Taft	40	229	508	67	24
6.0 7	Porterville	40	205	454	25	9

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
46.0 1	Fresno City	46	74	32	15	21	275	276	1.00	2023
26.0 2	Reedley	46	55	29	34	16	392	384	1.02	1984
19.0 3	Merced	43	63	21	42	9	404	344	1.17	1869
13.0 4	Sequoias	41	57	11	18	23	372	320	1.16	1707
6.0 5	Porterville	40	60	14	11	25	333	334	1.00	1641
21.0 6	Taft	40	54	16	21	24	338	355	.95	1624
15.0 7	Coalinga	37	63	21	16	7	329	267	1.23	1558

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
6.0 1	Porterville	40	40	336.0	478	501	418	11.20
15.0 2	Coalinga	37	37	325.0	436	340	287	7.95
21.0 3	Taft	40	40	350.0	433	294	245	6.30
19.0 4	Merced	43	43	387.0	402	264	251	5.84
13.0 5	Sequoias	41	41	364.1	449	272	220	5.43
26.0 6	Reedley	46	46	409.1	418	280	214	4.71
46.0 7	Fresno City	46	46	411.1	427	225	189	4.14

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
6.0 1	Porterville	40	40	258	6.91	27	2.39
15.0 2	Coalinga	37	37	273	7.56	13	1.90
13.0 3	Sequoias	41	41	255	6.30	15	1.74
21.0 4	Taft	40	40	269	6.92	23	1.74
26.0 5	Reedley	46	46	351	7.72	28	1.59
19.0 6	Merced	43	43	276	6.42	26	1.51
46.0 7	Fresno City	46	46	387	8.47	14	1.34

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
19.0 1	Merced	43	1699	1162	476	61	26	.964
46.0 2	Fresno City	46	1769	1230	473	66	17	.963
13.0 3	Sequoias	41	1581	1092	429	60	18	.962
26.0 4	Reedley	46	1762	1228	458	76	26	.957
21.0 5	Taft	40	1550	1050	433	67	13	.957
6.0 6	Porterville	40	1451	1006	330	115	36	.921
15.0 7	Coalinga	37	1411	978	321	112	26	.921

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
13.0 1	Sequoias	41	36	37	16	.302	0
21.0 2	Taft	40	21	46	19	.292	1
15.0 3	Coalinga	37	6	40	16	.286	3
46.0 4	Fresno City	46	39	42	14	.250	0
26.0 5	Reedley	46	24	38	10	.208	1
19.0 6	Merced	43	15	44	11	.200	2
6.0 7	Porterville	40	13	93	15	.139	2

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
26.0 1	Reedley	25	2,626	106
21.0 2	Taft	21	1,225	59
46.0 3	Fresno City	23	0	0
19.0 4	Merced	19	0	0
15.0 5	Coalinga	21	0	0
13.0 6	Sequoias	24	0	0
6.0 7	Porterville	19	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
10.0 1	Reedley	24	866	257	156	95	154	.297	.381	.411
27.0 2	Fresno City	24	858	274	201	150	165	.319	.434	.498
13.0 3	Coalinga	24	871	274	162	93	180	.315	.399	.418
12.0 4	Merced	24	867	268	200	126	162	.309	.410	.416
10.0 5	Sequoias	24	843	234	127	101	149	.278	.374	.380
15.0 6	Taft	24	849	250	140	94	152	.294	.378	.412
5.0 7	Porterville	24	817	197	82	100	194	.241	.343	.308

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
27.0 1	Fresno City	24	58	7	27	92
10.0 2	Reedley	24	43	13	10	66
15.0 3	Taft	24	49	3	15	67
12.0 4	Merced	24	39	9	12	60
13.0 5	Coalinga	24	41	5	13	59
10.0 6	Sequoias	24	44	6	10	60
5.0 7	Porterville	24	38	1	5	44

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
27.0 1	Fresno City	24	227	427	29	9
10.0 2	Reedley	24	183	356	15	4
12.0 3	Merced	24	229	361	33	6
10.0 4	Sequoias	24	153	320	15	12
13.0 5	Coalinga	24	181	364	45	11
15.0 6	Taft	24	156	350	40	18
5.0 7	Porterville	24	100	252	14	5

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
27.0 1	Fresno City	24	39	20	10	11	132	127	1.04	1077
10.0 2	Reedley	24	30	11	16	6	204	212	.96	1018
12.0 3	Merced	24	32	14	22	3	216	186	1.16	1061
10.0 4	Sequoias	24	33	7	10	9	220	197	1.12	994
5.0 5	Porterville	24	31	8	6	13	204	196	1.04	962
15.0 6	Taft	24	28	12	9	8	200	224	.89	992
13.0 7	Coalinga	24	40	16	14	6	214	172	1.24	1034

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
5.0 1	Porterville	24	24	205.0	316	312	269	11.81
13.0 2	Coalinga	24	24	208.1	296	233	199	8.60
15.0 3	Taft	24	24	208.0	261	176	148	6.40
12.0 4	Merced	24	24	213.0	216	136	128	5.41
10.0 5	Sequoias	24	24	213.0	236	134	110	4.65
10.0 5	Reedley	24	24	213.0	205	128	97	4.10
27.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	213.1	224	110	90	3.80

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
5.0 1	Porterville	24	24	150	6.59	21	2.37
13.0 2	Coalinga	24	24	160	6.91	11	2.01
10.0 3	Sequoias	24	24	149	6.30	11	1.62
15.0 4	Taft	24	24	175	7.57	13	1.72
10.0 5	Reedley	24	24	166	7.01	14	1.46
12.0 6	Merced	24	24	152	6.42	20	1.47
27.0 7	Fresno City	24	24	204	8.61	2	1.33

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
12.0 1	Merced	24	940	639	269	32	14	.966
27.0 2	Fresno City	24	945	639	265	41	12	.957
10.0 3	Sequoias	24	928	639	260	29	8	.969
10.0 3	Reedley	24	933	639	254	40	14	.957
15.0 5	Taft	24	917	624	257	36	8	.961
5.0 6	Porterville	24	873	615	192	66	20	.924
13.0 7	Coalinga	24	917	627	219	71	15	.923

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
10.0 1	Sequoias	24	17	15	9	.375	0
15.0 2	Taft	24	10	27	7	.206	0
13.0 3	Coalinga	24	6	22	14	.389	0
27.0 4	Fresno City	24	20	26	10	.278	0
10.0 5	Reedley	24	7	16	6	.273	1
12.0 6	Merced	24	10	20	6	.231	0
5.0 7	Porterville	24	5	65	9	.122	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
10.0 1	Reedley	12	1,177	99
15.0 2	Taft	12	750	63
27.0 3	Fresno City	12	0	0
12.0 4	Merced	12	0	0
13.0 5	Coalinga	12	0	0
10.0 6	Sequoias	12	0	0
5.0 7	Porterville	12	0	0