California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
39.0 1	Palomar	50	1898	685	462	184	288	.361	.435	.520
24.0 2	Grossmont	40	1391	420	288	211	255	.302	.408	.435
19.0 3	Southwestern	41	1389	404	222	160	279	.291	.388	.410
25.0 4	San Diego City	36	1262	353	203	139	217	.280	.380	.406
35.0 5	San Diego Mesa	39	1275	356	234	156	294	.279	.382	.452
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	1199	294	125	87	313	.245	.321	.316

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
39.0 1	Palomar	50	131	27	39	197
35.0 2	San Diego Mesa	39	83	16	35	134
25.0 3	San Diego City	36	67	9	25	101
24.0 4	Grossmont	40	81	16	24	121
19.0 5	Southwestern	41	76	16	19	111
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	46	12	5	63

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
39.0 1	Palomar	50	513	987	70	24
24.0 2	Grossmont	40	318	605	73	18
35.0 3	San Diego Mesa	39	254	576	72	13
25.0 4	San Diego City	36	252	513	47	18
19.0 5	Southwestern	41	249	569	27	11
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	162	379	19	8

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
39.0 1	Palomar	50	84	24	33	22	478	438	1.09	2223
24.0 2	Grossmont	40	55	26	12	26	322	384	.84	1695
19.0 3	Southwestern	41	72	19	18	36	333	368	.90	1658
35.0 4	San Diego Mesa	39	75	32	32	16	310	358	.87	1570
25.0 5	San Diego City	36	73	14	20	19	318	351	.91	1508
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	50	8	7	30	327	224	1.46	1351

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
5.0 1	Imperial Valley	37	37	297.2	504	487	400	12.09
24.0 2	Grossmont	40	40	346.0	418	297	246	6.40
35.0 3	San Diego Mesa	39	39	330.1	413	306	234	6.38
25.0 4	San Diego City	36	36	315.2	370	238	188	5.36
19.0 5	Southwestern	41	41	357.0	342	204	178	4.49
39.0 6	Palomar	50	50	440.1	457	279	218	4.46

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
39.0 1	Palomar	50	50	415	8.48	30	-
35.0 2	San Diego Mesa	39	39	219	5.97	33	-
25.0 3	San Diego City	36	36	261	7.44	20	-
24.0 4	Grossmont	40	40	307	7.99	20	-
19.0 5	Southwestern	41	41	252	6.35	19	-
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	37	206	6.23	37	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
19.0 1	Southwestern	41	1524	1071	392	61	10	.960
25.0 2	San Diego City	36	1336	947	332	57	11	.957
24.0 3	Grossmont	40	1490	1038	386	66	18	.956
39.0 4	Palomar	50	1908	1317	506	85	23	.955
35.0 5	San Diego Mesa	39	1504	991	419	94	9	.938
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	1310	893	329	88	21	.933

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
35.0 1	San Diego Mesa	39	24	36	19	.345	0
39.0 2	Palomar	50	27	43	17	.283	2
25.0 3	San Diego City	36	23	49	19	.279	0
19.0 4	Southwestern	41	28	31	10	.244	0
24.0 5	Grossmont	40	21	47	11	.190	1
5.0 6	Imperial Valley	37	19	96	17	.150	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
39.0 1	Palomar	25	2,850	114
19.0 2	Southwestern	23	1,600	70
35.0 3	San Diego Mesa	18	1,006	56
5.0 4	Imperial Valley	16	577	36
24.0 5	Grossmont	21	506	24
25.0 6	San Diego City	18	380	21

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
21.0 1	Palomar	25	945	340	244	101	127	.360	.443	.534
17.0 2	Grossmont	25	854	261	180	136	139	.306	.415	.451
14.0 3	Southwestern	25	855	244	135	96	163	.285	.381	.407
20.0 4	San Diego City	25	879	239	130	95	145	.272	.373	.408
25.0 5	San Diego Mesa	25	822	230	156	103	180	.280	.384	.462
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	782	186	64	54	211	.238	.305	.292

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
21.0 1	Palomar	25	70	16	21	107
25.0 2	San Diego Mesa	25	57	9	25	91
20.0 3	San Diego City	25	46	7	20	73
17.0 4	Grossmont	25	55	9	17	81
14.0 5	Southwestern	25	42	10	14	66
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	24	6	2	32

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
21.0 1	Palomar	25	276	505	40	12
17.0 2	Grossmont	25	198	385	34	12
25.0 3	San Diego Mesa	25	168	380	30	8
20.0 4	San Diego City	25	161	359	34	13
14.0 5	Southwestern	25	150	348	15	7
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	79	228	12	3

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
21.0 1	Palomar	25	52	14	14	8	238	233	1.02	1126
17.0 2	Grossmont	25	34	15	8	17	182	269	.68	1047
14.0 3	Southwestern	25	42	9	8	23	217	221	.98	1010
25.0 4	San Diego Mesa	25	49	20	19	8	196	242	.81	1013
20.0 5	San Diego City	25	52	9	16	10	225	257	.88	1051
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	24	6	5	23	222	148	1.50	871

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
2.0 1	Imperial Valley	25	25	198.2	335	316	264	11.96
17.0 2	Grossmont	25	25	214.0	258	174	143	6.01
25.0 3	San Diego Mesa	25	25	213.1	235	158	115	4.85
20.0 4	San Diego City	25	25	222.2	250	154	126	5.09
14.0 5	Southwestern	25	25	218.0	214	120	107	4.42
21.0 6	Palomar	25	25	220.2	208	110	89	3.63

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
21.0 1	Palomar	25	25	213	8.69	10	-
25.0 2	San Diego Mesa	25	25	117	4.94	16	-
20.0 3	San Diego City	25	25	184	7.44	17	-
17.0 4	Grossmont	25	25	187	7.86	15	-
14.0 5	Southwestern	25	25	147	6.07	14	-
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	25	117	5.30	27	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
14.0 1	Southwestern	25	939	654	254	31	6	.967
20.0 2	San Diego City	25	934	668	232	34	6	.964
17.0 3	Grossmont	25	931	642	251	38	7	.959
21.0 4	Palomar	25	948	661	255	32	11	.966
25.0 5	San Diego Mesa	25	985	640	287	58	6	.941
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	876	596	223	57	4	.935

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
25.0 1	San Diego Mesa	25	17	19	12	.387	0
21.0 2	Palomar	25	12	12	5	.294	0
20.0 3	San Diego City	25	16	31	15	.326	0
14.0 4	Southwestern	25	16	22	8	.267	0
17.0 5	Grossmont	25	18	18	5	.217	0
2.0 6	Imperial Valley	25	10	63	10	.137	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
21.0 1	Palomar	13	1,720	133
14.0 2	Southwestern	12	785	66
25.0 3	San Diego Mesa	12	678	57
2.0 4	Imperial Valley	11	402	37
17.0 5	Grossmont	14	431	31
20.0 6	San Diego City	13	330	25