California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.3609062170706006 1	Palomar	50	1898	685	462	184	288	.361	.435	.520
0.301941049604601 2	Grossmont	40	1391	420	288	211	255	.302	.408	.435
0.2908567314614831 3	Southwestern	41	1389	404	222	160	279	.291	.388	.410
0.2797147385103011 4	San Diego City	36	1262	353	203	139	217	.280	.380	.406
0.2792156862745098 5	San Diego Mesa	39	1275	356	234	156	294	.279	.382	.452
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	1199	294	125	87	313	.245	.321	.316

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.3609062170706006 1	Palomar	50	131	27	39	197
0.2792156862745098 2	San Diego Mesa	39	83	16	35	134
0.301941049604601 3	Grossmont	40	81	16	24	121
0.2908567314614831 4	Southwestern	41	76	16	19	111
0.2797147385103011 5	San Diego City	36	67	9	25	101
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	46	12	5	63

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.3609062170706006 1	Palomar	50	513	987	70	24
0.301941049604601 2	Grossmont	40	318	605	73	18
0.2792156862745098 3	San Diego Mesa	39	254	576	72	13
0.2797147385103011 4	San Diego City	36	252	513	47	18
0.2908567314614831 5	Southwestern	41	249	569	27	11
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	162	379	19	8

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.3609062170706006 1	Palomar	50	84	24	33	22	478	438	1.09	2223
0.301941049604601 2	Grossmont	40	55	26	12	26	322	384	.84	1695
0.2908567314614831 3	Southwestern	41	72	19	18	36	333	368	.90	1658
0.2792156862745098 4	San Diego Mesa	39	75	32	32	16	310	358	.87	1570
0.2797147385103011 5	San Diego City	36	73	14	20	19	318	351	.91	1508
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	50	8	7	30	327	224	1.46	1351

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.24520433694745622 1	Imperial Valley	37	37	297.2	504	487	400	12.09
0.301941049604601 2	Grossmont	40	40	346.0	418	297	246	6.40
0.2792156862745098 3	San Diego Mesa	39	39	330.1	413	306	234	6.38
0.2797147385103011 4	San Diego City	36	36	315.2	370	238	188	5.36
0.2908567314614831 5	Southwestern	41	41	357.0	342	204	178	4.49
0.3609062170706006 6	Palomar	50	50	440.1	457	279	218	4.46

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
0.3609062170706006 1	Palomar	50	50	415	8.48	30	-
0.301941049604601 2	Grossmont	40	40	307	7.99	20	-
0.2908567314614831 3	Southwestern	41	41	252	6.35	19	-
0.2797147385103011 4	San Diego City	36	36	261	7.44	20	-
0.2792156862745098 5	San Diego Mesa	39	39	219	5.97	33	-
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	37	206	6.23	37	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.2908567314614831 1	Southwestern	41	1524	1071	392	61	10	.960
0.2797147385103011 2	San Diego City	36	1336	947	332	57	11	.957
0.301941049604601 3	Grossmont	40	1490	1038	386	66	18	.956
0.3609062170706006 4	Palomar	50	1908	1317	506	85	23	.955
0.2792156862745098 5	San Diego Mesa	39	1504	991	419	94	9	.938
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	1310	893	329	88	21	.933

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.2792156862745098 1	San Diego Mesa	39	24	36	19	.345	0
0.3609062170706006 2	Palomar	50	27	43	17	.283	2
0.2797147385103011 3	San Diego City	36	23	49	19	.279	0
0.2908567314614831 4	Southwestern	41	28	31	10	.244	0
0.301941049604601 5	Grossmont	40	21	47	11	.190	1
0.24520433694745622 6	Imperial Valley	37	19	96	17	.150	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.3609062170706006 1	Palomar	25	2,850	114
0.2908567314614831 2	Southwestern	23	1,600	70
0.2792156862745098 3	San Diego Mesa	18	1,006	56
0.24520433694745622 4	Imperial Valley	16	577	36
0.301941049604601 5	Grossmont	21	506	24
0.2797147385103011 6	San Diego City	18	380	21

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.35978835978835977 1	Palomar	25	945	340	244	101	127	.360	.443	.534
0.30562060889929743 2	Grossmont	25	854	261	180	136	139	.306	.415	.451
0.28538011695906434 3	Southwestern	25	855	244	135	96	163	.285	.381	.407
0.27189988623435724 4	San Diego City	25	879	239	130	95	145	.272	.373	.408
0.2798053527980535 5	San Diego Mesa	25	822	230	156	103	180	.280	.384	.462
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	782	186	64	54	211	.238	.305	.292

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.35978835978835977 1	Palomar	25	70	16	21	107
0.2798053527980535 2	San Diego Mesa	25	57	9	25	91
0.30562060889929743 3	Grossmont	25	55	9	17	81
0.28538011695906434 4	Southwestern	25	42	10	14	66
0.27189988623435724 5	San Diego City	25	46	7	20	73
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	24	6	2	32

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.35978835978835977 1	Palomar	25	276	505	40	12
0.30562060889929743 2	Grossmont	25	198	385	34	12
0.2798053527980535 3	San Diego Mesa	25	168	380	30	8
0.27189988623435724 4	San Diego City	25	161	359	34	13
0.28538011695906434 5	Southwestern	25	150	348	15	7
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	79	228	12	3

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.35978835978835977 1	Palomar	25	52	14	14	8	238	233	1.02	1126
0.30562060889929743 2	Grossmont	25	34	15	8	17	182	269	.68	1047
0.28538011695906434 3	Southwestern	25	42	9	8	23	217	221	.98	1010
0.2798053527980535 4	San Diego Mesa	25	49	20	19	8	196	242	.81	1013
0.27189988623435724 5	San Diego City	25	52	9	16	10	225	257	.88	1051
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	24	6	5	23	222	148	1.50	871

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.23785166240409208 1	Imperial Valley	25	25	198.2	335	316	264	11.96
0.30562060889929743 2	Grossmont	25	25	214.0	258	174	143	6.01
0.2798053527980535 3	San Diego Mesa	25	25	213.1	235	158	115	4.85
0.27189988623435724 4	San Diego City	25	25	222.2	250	154	126	5.09
0.28538011695906434 5	Southwestern	25	25	218.0	214	120	107	4.42
0.35978835978835977 6	Palomar	25	25	220.2	208	110	89	3.63

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
0.35978835978835977 1	Palomar	25	25	213	8.69	10	-
0.30562060889929743 2	Grossmont	25	25	187	7.86	15	-
0.28538011695906434 3	Southwestern	25	25	147	6.07	14	-
0.27189988623435724 4	San Diego City	25	25	184	7.44	17	-
0.2798053527980535 5	San Diego Mesa	25	25	117	4.94	16	-
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	25	117	5.30	27	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.28538011695906434 1	Southwestern	25	939	654	254	31	6	.967
0.27189988623435724 2	San Diego City	25	934	668	232	34	6	.964
0.30562060889929743 3	Grossmont	25	931	642	251	38	7	.959
0.35978835978835977 4	Palomar	25	948	661	255	32	11	.966
0.2798053527980535 5	San Diego Mesa	25	985	640	287	58	6	.941
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	876	596	223	57	4	.935

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.2798053527980535 1	San Diego Mesa	25	17	19	12	.387	0
0.35978835978835977 2	Palomar	25	12	12	5	.294	0
0.27189988623435724 3	San Diego City	25	16	31	15	.326	0
0.28538011695906434 4	Southwestern	25	16	22	8	.267	0
0.30562060889929743 5	Grossmont	25	18	18	5	.217	0
0.23785166240409208 6	Imperial Valley	25	10	63	10	.137	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.35978835978835977 1	Palomar	13	1,720	133
0.28538011695906434 2	Southwestern	12	785	66
0.2798053527980535 3	San Diego Mesa	12	678	57
0.23785166240409208 4	Imperial Valley	11	402	37
0.30562060889929743 5	Grossmont	14	431	31
0.27189988623435724 6	San Diego City	13	330	25