California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.32567049808429116 1	Merced	42	1566	510	346	175	253	.326	.402	.481
0.30221300138312585 2	Sequoias	41	1446	437	254	173	238	.302	.393	.396
0.30071754729288974 3	Fresno City	43	1533	461	306	242	379	.301	.410	.444
0.28685548293391433 4	Reedley	40	1377	395	260	237	273	.287	.408	.424
0.2534595775673707 5	Taft	40	1373	348	198	174	303	.253	.357	.348
0.2361111111111111 6	Coalinga	39	1296	306	149	106	336	.236	.312	.296
0.22102009273570325 7	Porterville	40	1294	286	131	147	368	.221	.329	.277

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.32567049808429116 1	Merced	42	93	21	36	150
0.30071754729288974 2	Fresno City	43	77	17	36	130
0.28685548293391433 3	Reedley	40	84	9	29	122
0.30221300138312585 4	Sequoias	41	83	8	12	103
0.2534595775673707 5	Taft	40	69	5	17	91
0.2361111111111111 6	Coalinga	39	36	10	7	53
0.22102009273570325 7	Porterville	40	40	1	10	51

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.32567049808429116 1	Merced	42	394	753	80	10
0.30071754729288974 2	Fresno City	43	354	680	52	8
0.28685548293391433 3	Reedley	40	311	584	27	11
0.30221300138312585 4	Sequoias	41	288	572	34	14
0.2534595775673707 5	Taft	40	223	478	58	14
0.2361111111111111 6	Coalinga	39	172	383	32	12
0.22102009273570325 7	Porterville	40	153	358	31	7

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.30071754729288974 1	Fresno City	43	54	19	28	19	324	364	.89	1876
0.32567049808429116 2	Merced	42	48	33	21	15	365	410	.89	1843
0.28685548293391433 3	Reedley	40	55	16	24	34	318	378	.84	1709
0.30221300138312585 4	Sequoias	41	51	14	20	36	380	374	1.02	1704
0.2534595775673707 5	Taft	40	53	12	15	18	331	374	.89	1627
0.22102009273570325 6	Porterville	40	68	12	16	28	303	321	.94	1537
0.2361111111111111 7	Coalinga	39	43	13	15	11	342	287	1.19	1473

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.22102009273570325 1	Porterville	40	40	338.1	478	473	393	10.45
0.2361111111111111 2	Coalinga	39	39	332.1	457	359	297	8.04
0.2534595775673707 3	Taft	40	40	345.2	416	304	235	6.12
0.32567049808429116 4	Merced	42	42	366.1	407	275	237	5.82
0.30221300138312585 5	Sequoias	41	41	359.2	436	258	213	5.33
0.28685548293391433 6	Reedley	40	40	349.2	380	235	175	4.50
0.30071754729288974 7	Fresno City	43	43	387.0	359	217	169	3.93

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
0.22102009273570325 1	Porterville	40	40	286	7.61	30	2.30
0.2361111111111111 2	Coalinga	39	39	239	6.47	23	1.85
0.2534595775673707 3	Taft	40	40	292	7.60	33	1.73
0.30221300138312585 4	Sequoias	41	41	244	6.11	22	1.70
0.32567049808429116 5	Merced	42	42	343	8.43	34	1.61
0.28685548293391433 6	Reedley	40	40	292	7.52	19	1.51
0.30071754729288974 7	Fresno City	43	43	403	9.37	10	1.38

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.30221300138312585 1	Sequoias	41	1555	1079	415	61	10	.961
0.32567049808429116 2	Merced	42	1572	1098	411	63	19	.960
0.30071754729288974 3	Fresno City	43	1661	1160	422	79	18	.952
0.2534595775673707 4	Taft	40	1526	1037	404	85	17	.944
0.28685548293391433 5	Reedley	40	1504	1049	369	86	7	.943
0.2361111111111111 6	Coalinga	39	1413	997	321	95	11	.933
0.22102009273570325 7	Porterville	40	1416	1015	302	99	54	.930

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.28685548293391433 1	Reedley	40	19	23	11	.324	0
0.30071754729288974 2	Fresno City	43	30	35	12	.255	2
0.30221300138312585 3	Sequoias	41	37	32	10	.238	0
0.32567049808429116 4	Merced	42	15	32	9	.220	0
0.2534595775673707 5	Taft	40	23	68	15	.181	2
0.2361111111111111 6	Coalinga	39	5	91	11	.108	0
0.22102009273570325 7	Porterville	40	20	93	6	.061	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.30071754729288974 1	Fresno City	23	4,196	183
0.28685548293391433 2	Reedley	20	2,806	141
0.2534595775673707 3	Taft	18	835	47
0.2361111111111111 4	Coalinga	17	608	36
0.30221300138312585 5	Sequoias	23	100	5
0.32567049808429116 6	Merced	18	0	0
0.22102009273570325 7	Porterville	22	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
0.33854748603351953 1	Merced	24	895	303	218	107	132	.339	.417	.517
0.3118405627198124 2	Sequoias	24	853	266	166	111	132	.312	.409	.404
0.31724137931034485 3	Fresno City	24	870	276	187	141	198	.317	.424	.453
0.302540415704388 4	Reedley	24	866	262	169	153	161	.303	.422	.453
0.273696682464455 5	Taft	24	844	231	128	89	168	.274	.359	.370
0.24354243542435425 6	Coalinga	24	813	198	88	69	222	.244	.322	.305
0.22304832713754646 7	Porterville	24	807	180	73	82	221	.223	.318	.271

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
0.33854748603351953 1	Merced	24	52	12	28	92
0.31724137931034485 2	Fresno City	24	46	12	16	74
0.302540415704388 3	Reedley	24	55	6	21	82
0.3118405627198124 4	Sequoias	24	44	4	9	57
0.273696682464455 5	Taft	24	39	3	12	54
0.24354243542435425 6	Coalinga	24	23	6	5	34
0.22304832713754646 7	Porterville	24	22	1	5	28

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
0.33854748603351953 1	Merced	24	242	463	41	4
0.31724137931034485 2	Fresno City	24	220	394	36	4
0.302540415704388 3	Reedley	24	207	392	15	4
0.3118405627198124 4	Sequoias	24	190	345	21	11
0.273696682464455 5	Taft	24	142	312	28	5
0.24354243542435425 6	Coalinga	24	99	248	24	4
0.22304832713754646 7	Porterville	24	91	219	23	3

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.31724137931034485 1	Fresno City	24	29	11	17	9	174	218	.80	1068
0.33854748603351953 2	Merced	24	24	16	17	11	203	246	.83	1059
0.302540415704388 3	Reedley	24	34	12	13	22	200	232	.86	1078
0.3118405627198124 4	Sequoias	24	38	13	14	18	217	231	.94	1029
0.273696682464455 5	Taft	24	29	9	11	10	209	232	.90	982
0.22304832713754646 6	Porterville	24	34	9	10	16	194	202	.96	942
0.24354243542435425 7	Coalinga	24	28	6	12	5	206	180	1.14	928

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
0.22304832713754646 1	Porterville	24	24	208.1	297	298	246	10.63
0.24354243542435425 2	Coalinga	24	24	209.1	274	218	165	7.09
0.273696682464455 3	Taft	24	24	207.2	239	167	129	5.59
0.33854748603351953 4	Merced	24	24	210.1	219	124	113	4.84
0.3118405627198124 5	Sequoias	24	24	211.0	243	126	99	4.22
0.302540415704388 6	Reedley	24	24	213.0	251	158	119	5.03
0.31724137931034485 7	Fresno City	24	24	215.0	193	100	76	3.18

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
0.22304832713754646 1	Porterville	24	24	155	6.70	19	2.34
0.24354243542435425 2	Coalinga	24	24	153	6.58	18	1.76
0.273696682464455 3	Taft	24	24	178	7.71	18	1.68
0.3118405627198124 4	Sequoias	24	24	155	6.61	10	1.54
0.33854748603351953 5	Merced	24	24	204	8.73	12	1.55
0.302540415704388 6	Reedley	24	24	166	7.01	12	1.54
0.31724137931034485 7	Fresno City	24	24	223	9.33	7	1.32

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
0.3118405627198124 1	Sequoias	24	905	633	234	38	6	.958
0.33854748603351953 2	Merced	24	890	630	234	26	8	.971
0.31724137931034485 3	Fresno City	24	933	644	248	41	8	.956
0.273696682464455 4	Taft	24	916	623	253	40	9	.956
0.302540415704388 5	Reedley	24	907	639	212	56	4	.938
0.24354243542435425 6	Coalinga	24	905	628	206	71	7	.922
0.22304832713754646 7	Porterville	24	888	625	209	54	26	.939

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.302540415704388 1	Reedley	24	9	15	5	.250	0
0.31724137931034485 2	Fresno City	24	16	13	4	.235	1
0.3118405627198124 3	Sequoias	24	24	14	3	.176	0
0.33854748603351953 4	Merced	24	9	17	5	.227	0
0.273696682464455 5	Taft	24	16	27	5	.156	0
0.24354243542435425 6	Coalinga	24	4	49	6	.109	0
0.22304832713754646 7	Porterville	24	13	53	4	.070	0

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
0.31724137931034485 1	Fresno City	12	1,534	128
0.302540415704388 2	Reedley	12	1,740	145
0.273696682464455 3	Taft	12	525	44
0.24354243542435425 4	Coalinga	12	298	25
0.3118405627198124 5	Sequoias	12	0	0
0.33854748603351953 6	Merced	12	0	0
0.22304832713754646 7	Porterville	12	0	0