Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.32323232323232326 1 San Diego City 19 693 224 150 86 101 .323 .415 .463
0.3196004993757803 2 San Diego Mesa 22 801 256 157 103 134 .320 .415 .473
0.31145251396648044 3 Palomar 21 716 223 148 114 137 .311 .432 .405
0.2930800542740841 4 Grossmont 21 737 216 141 105 154 .293 .405 .412
0.25660964230171074 5 Southwestern 20 643 165 86 85 117 .257 .358 .342
0.24920127795527156 6 Imperial Valley 20 626 156 66 68 145 .249 .335 .318
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
79.0 1 San Diego Mesa 22 53 8 18 79
69.0 2 San Diego City 19 50 10 9 69
65.0 3 Grossmont 21 50 7 8 65
51.0 4 Palomar 21 41 4 6 51
37.0 5 Southwestern 20 23 10 4 37
24.0 6 Imperial Valley 20 11 7 6 24
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
178.0 1 San Diego City 19 178 321 22 6
173.0 2 San Diego Mesa 22 173 379 13 9
165.0 3 Palomar 21 165 290 31 8
158.0 4 Grossmont 21 158 304 29 5
102.0 5 Southwestern 20 102 220 30 15
74.0 6 Imperial Valley 20 74 199 20 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
966.0 1 San Diego Mesa 22 33 7 22 21 226 193 1.17 966
912.0 2 Palomar 21 47 12 23 10 186 165 1.13 912
892.0 3 Grossmont 21 38 6 6 17 177 180 .98 892
827.0 4 San Diego City 19 31 11 6 17 139 218 .64 827
781.0 5 Southwestern 20 23 12 18 15 149 222 .67 781
725.0 6 Imperial Valley 20 16 6 9 13 163 155 1.05 725
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
12.611464968152866 1 Imperial Valley 20 20 157.0 270 271 220 12.61
6.1279863481228665 2 San Diego Mesa 22 22 195.1 241 167 133 6.13
6.066298342541437 3 Palomar 21 21 181.0 227 161 122 6.07
4.7967032967032965 4 Grossmont 21 21 182.0 204 111 97 4.80
3.8802395209580838 5 San Diego City 19 19 167.0 147 94 72 3.88
2.690036900369004 6 Southwestern 20 20 180.2 145 72 54 2.69
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Grossmont 21 21 141 6.97 9 -
- 2 Imperial Valley 20 20 80 4.59 14 -
- 2 Palomar 21 21 152 7.56 6 -
- 2 San Diego City 19 19 155 8.35 4 -
- 2 San Diego Mesa 22 22 158 7.28 18 -
- 2 Southwestern 20 20 146 7.27 5 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.962772785622593 1 Southwestern 20 779 542 208 29 4 .963
0.9619289340101523 2 Grossmont 21 788 546 212 30 12 .962
0.9600484261501211 3 San Diego Mesa 22 826 586 207 33 10 .960
0.951856946354883 4 San Diego City 19 727 501 191 35 8 .952
0.9508408796895214 5 Palomar 21 773 542 193 38 9 .951
0.9379407616361072 6 Imperial Valley 20 709 470 195 44 22 .938
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.4827586206896552 1 San Diego Mesa 22 17 15 14 .483 -
0.34285714285714286 2 Palomar 21 18 23 12 .343 -
0.19230769230769232 3 Southwestern 20 19 21 5 .192 1
0.1111111111111111 4 Grossmont 21 13 32 4 .111 -
0.1111111111111111 4 San Diego City 19 13 24 3 .111 -
0.03508771929824561 6 Imperial Valley 20 3 55 2 .035 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
116.66666666666667 1 Palomar 12 1,400 117
91.66666666666667 2 Southwestern 12 1,100 92
73.8 3 San Diego Mesa 5 369 74
60.55555555555556 4 Grossmont 9 545 61
60.0 5 San Diego City 7 420 60
0.0 6 Imperial Valley 7 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.39303482587064675 1 San Diego City 5 201 79 71 32 23 .393 .496 .637
0.3359683794466403 2 San Diego Mesa 7 253 85 39 21 55 .336 .410 .494
0.33766233766233766 3 Palomar 7 231 78 54 40 27 .338 .466 .472
0.30980392156862746 4 Grossmont 7 255 79 52 39 38 .310 .437 .408
0.25157232704402516 5 Southwestern 5 159 40 20 17 34 .252 .332 .314
0.2072072072072072 6 Imperial Valley 7 222 46 13 20 53 .207 .290 .270
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
26.0 1 San Diego Mesa 7 17 4 5 26
32.0 2 San Diego City 5 21 5 6 32
18.0 3 Grossmont 7 13 3 2 18
23.0 4 Palomar 7 18 2 3 23
8.0 5 Southwestern 5 7 - 1 8
6.0 6 Imperial Valley 7 - 4 2 6
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
78.0 1 San Diego City 5 78 128 7 1
42.0 2 San Diego Mesa 7 42 125 4 1
59.0 3 Palomar 7 59 109 9 1
57.0 4 Grossmont 7 57 104 10 3
21.0 5 Southwestern 5 21 50 4 2
16.0 6 Imperial Valley 7 16 60 8 1
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
296.0 1 San Diego Mesa 7 12 2 8 6 70 49 1.43 296
308.0 2 Palomar 7 19 4 14 3 66 71 .93 308
317.0 3 Grossmont 7 20 2 1 3 58 73 .79 317
249.0 4 San Diego City 5 12 3 1 3 36 58 .62 249
188.0 5 Southwestern 5 4 4 4 3 31 59 .53 188
255.0 6 Imperial Valley 7 7 3 3 4 63 58 1.09 255
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
16.93220338983051 1 Imperial Valley 7 7 59.0 116 128 111 16.93
5.9016393442622945 2 San Diego Mesa 7 7 61.0 76 48 40 5.90
2.612903225806452 3 Palomar 7 7 62.0 67 25 18 2.61
4.868852459016394 4 Grossmont 7 7 61.0 73 35 33 4.87
3.0 5 San Diego City 5 5 45.0 33 16 15 3.00
2.930232558139535 6 Southwestern 5 5 43.0 42 21 14 2.93
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
$value 1 Grossmont 7 7 43 6.34 3 -
- 2 Imperial Valley 7 7 26 3.97 8 -
- 2 Palomar 7 7 44 6.39 2 -
- 2 San Diego City 5 5 52 10.40 - -
- 2 San Diego Mesa 7 7 35 5.16 4 -
- 2 Southwestern 5 5 30 6.28 2 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.9591836734693877 1 Southwestern 5 196 129 59 8 1 .959
0.9731800766283525 2 Grossmont 7 261 183 71 7 4 .973
0.9732824427480916 3 San Diego Mesa 7 262 183 72 7 3 .973
0.9479166666666666 4 San Diego City 5 192 135 47 10 4 .948
0.9655172413793104 5 Palomar 7 261 185 67 9 - .966
0.9510204081632653 6 Imperial Valley 7 245 176 57 12 8 .951
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.8 1 San Diego Mesa 7 4 1 4 .800 -
0.42857142857142855 2 Palomar 7 8 4 3 .429 -
- 3 Southwestern 5 6 2 - - -
0.06666666666666667 4 Grossmont 7 3 14 1 .067 -
- 5 San Diego City 5 1 5 - - -
0.058823529411764705 6 Imperial Valley 7 - 16 1 .059 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
141.0 1 Palomar 5 705 141
75.0 2 Southwestern 2 150 75
73.33333333333333 3 San Diego Mesa 3 220 73
8.333333333333334 4 Grossmont 3 25 8
58.333333333333336 5 San Diego City 3 175 58
0.0 6 Imperial Valley 3 0 0