Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.407673860911271 1 Fresno City 20 686 202 133 111 166 .294 .408 .434
0.3936052921719956 2 Sequoias 22 771 231 135 101 110 .300 .394 .387
0.38258877434135163 3 Reedley 21 732 209 111 108 135 .286 .383 .395
0.3806060606060606 4 Merced 20 701 196 127 92 142 .280 .381 .391
0.3432343234323432 5 Coalinga 23 803 215 98 67 187 .268 .343 .330
0.33747178329571104 6 Taft 22 769 185 91 89 185 .241 .337 .343
0.3260025873221216 7 Porterville 23 659 139 52 82 168 .211 .326 .253
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.407673860911271 1 Fresno City 20 36 6 16 58
0.38258877434135163 2 Reedley 21 44 6 8 58
0.3936052921719956 3 Sequoias 22 46 6 3 55
0.3806060606060606 4 Merced 20 42 3 10 55
0.33747178329571104 5 Taft 22 24 5 15 44
0.3432343234323432 6 Coalinga 23 33 4 3 40
0.3260025873221216 7 Porterville 23 20 1 2 23
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.3806060606060606 1 Merced 20 156 274 39 5
0.3936052921719956 2 Sequoias 22 154 298 16 5
0.407673860911271 3 Fresno City 20 153 298 26 14
0.38258877434135163 4 Reedley 21 126 289 19 7
0.3432343234323432 5 Coalinga 23 118 265 11 7
0.33747178329571104 6 Taft 22 105 264 28 11
0.3260025873221216 7 Porterville 23 66 167 17 14
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3936052921719956 1 Sequoias 22 25 10 12 18 219 207 1.06 919
0.3432343234323432 2 Coalinga 23 30 9 5 4 112 97 1.15 914
0.33747178329571104 3 Taft 22 25 3 9 7 192 177 1.08 895
0.38258877434135163 4 Reedley 21 17 16 11 17 190 207 .92 884
0.407673860911271 5 Fresno City 20 27 10 17 7 125 167 .75 851
0.3806060606060606 6 Merced 20 26 6 12 10 148 162 .91 837
0.3260025873221216 7 Porterville 23 31 1 8 18 173 122 1.42 781
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.3260025873221216 1 Porterville 23 23 177.1 297 233 184 9.34
0.3432343234323432 2 Coalinga 23 23 200.1 267 207 164 7.37
0.33747178329571104 3 Taft 22 22 194.1 266 167 127 5.88
0.3806060606060606 4 Merced 20 20 178.0 164 95 79 3.99
0.3936052921719956 5 Sequoias 22 22 197.0 179 90 76 3.47
0.38258877434135163 6 Reedley 21 21 195.0 164 69 52 2.40
0.407673860911271 7 Fresno City 20 20 179.2 142 68 35 1.75
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.3260025873221216 1 Porterville 23 23 95 4.82 8 2.33
0.3432343234323432 2 Coalinga 23 23 125 5.62 13 1.93
0.33747178329571104 3 Taft 22 22 130 6.02 10 1.88
0.3806060606060606 4 Merced 20 20 180 9.10 2 1.38
0.407673860911271 5 Fresno City 20 20 205 10.27 0 1.28
0.38258877434135163 6 Reedley 21 21 153 7.06 7 1.22
0.3936052921719956 7 Sequoias 22 22 163 7.45 11 1.17
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.3806060606060606 1 Merced 20 754 532 201 21 19 .972
0.3936052921719956 2 Sequoias 22 844 591 221 32 1 .962
0.38258877434135163 3 Reedley 21 825 585 208 32 8 .961
0.3260025873221216 4 Porterville 23 761 532 194 35 12 .954
0.407673860911271 5 Fresno City 20 759 539 185 35 1 .954
0.33747178329571104 6 Taft 22 844 583 210 51 5 .940
0.3432343234323432 7 Coalinga 23 778 600 128 50 17 .936
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3806060606060606 1 Merced 20 12 9 6 .400 0
0.38258877434135163 2 Reedley 21 23 13 8 .381 -
0.407673860911271 3 Fresno City 20 10 22 13 .371 0
0.3936052921719956 4 Sequoias 22 18 10 5 .333 -
0.3432343234323432 5 Coalinga 23 8 31 8 .205 0
0.3260025873221216 6 Porterville 23 16 38 9 .191 0
0.33747178329571104 7 Taft 22 19 32 3 .086 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.38258877434135163 1 Reedley 11 1,268 116
0.33747178329571104 2 Taft 9 605 68
0.407673860911271 3 Fresno City 11 520 48
0.3806060606060606 4 Merced 11 102 10
0.3260025873221216 5 Porterville 14 60 5
0.3936052921719956 6 Sequoias 15 0 0
0.3432343234323432 7 Coalinga 12 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.4646153846153846 1 Fresno City 7 253 86 65 51 52 .340 .465 .506
0.38274932614555257 2 Sequoias 9 318 91 52 40 45 .286 .383 .374
0.41247002398081534 3 Reedley 10 349 112 69 50 59 .321 .412 .447
0.3900709219858156 4 Merced 7 241 71 40 32 40 .295 .390 .407
0.33707865168539325 5 Coalinga 11 398 106 38 37 84 .266 .337 .329
0.33624454148471616 6 Taft 11 400 97 43 39 94 .242 .336 .338
0.35335689045936397 7 Porterville 7 237 54 24 32 47 .228 .353 .266
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.4646153846153846 1 Fresno City 7 13 4 7 24
0.41247002398081534 2 Reedley 10 27 1 5 33
0.38274932614555257 3 Sequoias 9 16 3 2 21
0.3900709219858156 4 Merced 7 14 2 3 19
0.33624454148471616 5 Taft 11 7 2 9 18
0.33707865168539325 6 Coalinga 11 14 4 1 19
0.35335689045936397 7 Porterville 7 9 0 0 9
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.3900709219858156 1 Merced 7 49 98 7 1
0.38274932614555257 2 Sequoias 9 55 119 4 4
0.4646153846153846 3 Fresno City 7 73 128 13 5
0.41247002398081534 4 Reedley 10 74 156 10 3
0.33707865168539325 5 Coalinga 11 51 131 2 3
0.33624454148471616 6 Taft 11 52 135 14 6
0.35335689045936397 7 Porterville 7 30 63 4 2
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.38274932614555257 1 Sequoias 9 11 2 7 7 101 81 1.25 378
0.33707865168539325 2 Coalinga 11 7 3 2 1 46 43 1.07 447
0.33624454148471616 3 Taft 11 18 1 5 2 97 86 1.13 463
0.41247002398081534 4 Reedley 10 10 8 6 9 84 100 .84 423
0.4646153846153846 5 Fresno City 7 14 7 4 - 27 65 .42 329
0.3900709219858156 6 Merced 7 7 2 4 4 38 47 .81 286
0.35335689045936397 7 Porterville 7 14 0 5 5 48 39 1.23 288
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.35335689045936397 1 Porterville 7 7 61.0 96 77 65 9.59
0.33707865168539325 2 Coalinga 11 11 99.2 150 109 84 7.59
0.33624454148471616 3 Taft 11 11 100.1 130 79 59 5.29
0.3900709219858156 4 Merced 7 7 61.0 62 37 32 4.72
0.38274932614555257 5 Sequoias 9 9 80.0 69 32 30 3.38
0.41247002398081534 6 Reedley 10 10 89.0 64 28 20 2.02
0.4646153846153846 7 Fresno City 7 7 63.0 47 22 8 1.14
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.35335689045936397 1 Porterville 7 7 40 5.90 5 2.36
0.33707865168539325 2 Coalinga 11 11 60 5.42 6 2.16
0.33624454148471616 3 Taft 11 11 63 5.65 4 1.87
0.3900709219858156 4 Merced 7 7 63 9.30 0 1.44
0.4646153846153846 5 Fresno City 7 7 65 9.29 0 1.24
0.41247002398081534 6 Reedley 10 10 68 6.88 4 1.15
0.38274932614555257 7 Sequoias 9 9 62 6.98 8 1.05
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.3900709219858156 1 Merced 7 236 183 49 4 6 .983
0.38274932614555257 2 Sequoias 9 339 240 96 3 - .991
0.41247002398081534 3 Reedley 10 386 267 100 19 3 .951
0.35335689045936397 4 Porterville 7 241 183 48 10 4 .959
0.4646153846153846 5 Fresno City 7 269 189 64 16 1 .941
0.33624454148471616 6 Taft 11 433 301 108 24 2 .945
0.33707865168539325 7 Coalinga 11 387 299 59 29 8 .925
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3900709219858156 1 Merced 7 5 0 2 1.000 0
0.41247002398081534 2 Reedley 10 9 9 3 .250 -
0.4646153846153846 3 Fresno City 7 2 4 5 .556 0
0.38274932614555257 4 Sequoias 9 6 5 3 .375 -
0.33707865168539325 5 Coalinga 11 4 14 3 .176 0
0.35335689045936397 6 Porterville 7 7 8 4 .333 0
0.33624454148471616 7 Taft 11 9 13 3 .188 0
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.41247002398081534 1 Reedley 5 559 112
0.33624454148471616 2 Taft 5 350 70
0.4646153846153846 3 Fresno City 4 0 0
0.3900709219858156 4 Merced 3 0 0
0.35335689045936397 5 Porterville 4 0 0
0.38274932614555257 6 Sequoias 4 0 0
0.33707865168539325 7 Coalinga 6 - -