Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
328.0 1 Barstow 40 1479 480 295 179 228 .325 .414 .437
434.0 2 Glendale 47 1781 574 392 221 348 .322 .414 .506
291.0 3 Canyons 39 1436 434 258 193 251 .302 .395 .430
213.0 4 Antelope Valley 39 1310 364 186 141 279 .278 .360 .373
236.0 5 Citrus 40 1345 368 206 185 261 .274 .371 .353
206.0 6 Victor Valley 39 1339 357 155 146 249 .267 .360 .338
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
434.0 1 Glendale 47 112 12 64 188
291.0 2 Canyons 39 90 20 18 128
328.0 3 Barstow 40 68 15 23 106
236.0 4 Citrus 40 66 4 11 81
213.0 5 Antelope Valley 39 48 22 11 81
206.0 6 Victor Valley 39 65 2 9 76
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
434.0 1 Glendale 47 434 902 103 26
328.0 2 Barstow 40 328 647 37 17
291.0 3 Canyons 39 291 618 30 6
236.0 4 Citrus 40 236 475 61 19
213.0 5 Antelope Valley 39 213 489 54 13
206.0 6 Victor Valley 39 206 453 77 32
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
434.0 1 Glendale 47 79 29 15 24 330 450 .73 2125
328.0 2 Barstow 40 58 14 15 27 375 339 1.11 1745
291.0 3 Canyons 39 41 20 21 25 330 321 1.03 1711
236.0 4 Citrus 40 39 28 28 23 336 370 .91 1625
206.0 5 Victor Valley 39 54 9 10 36 286 258 1.11 1558
213.0 6 Antelope Valley 39 33 11 24 30 324 329 .98 1519
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
213.0 1 Antelope Valley 39 39 321.2 467 339 284 7.95
328.0 2 Barstow 40 40 346.0 462 302 248 6.45
236.0 3 Citrus 40 40 354.1 442 291 247 6.27
291.0 4 Canyons 39 39 341.0 386 256 223 5.89
206.0 5 Victor Valley 39 39 312.0 384 255 195 5.63
434.0 6 Glendale 47 47 420.0 409 266 218 4.67
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
213.0 1 Antelope Valley 39 39 218 6.10 21 2.03
434.0 2 Glendale 47 47 394 8.44 18 -
328.0 3 Barstow 40 40 191 4.97 24 -
291.0 4 Canyons 39 39 265 6.99 28 -
236.0 5 Citrus 40 40 335 8.51 21 -
206.0 6 Victor Valley 39 39 198 5.71 20 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
328.0 1 Barstow 40 1462 1005 414 43 8 .971
434.0 2 Glendale 47 1798 1238 500 60 35 .967
291.0 3 Canyons 39 1328 937 332 59 19 .956
236.0 4 Citrus 40 1481 1024 388 69 13 .953
206.0 5 Victor Valley 39 1184 795 326 63 18 .947
213.0 6 Antelope Valley 39 1417 964 370 83 7 .941
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
213.0 1 Antelope Valley 39 26 50 24 .324 1
206.0 2 Victor Valley 39 17 50 20 .286 -
328.0 3 Barstow 40 35 54 21 .280 -
291.0 4 Canyons 39 17 44 12 .214 -
236.0 5 Citrus 40 27 66 17 .205 1
434.0 6 Glendale 47 46 74 15 .169 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
434.0 1 Glendale 22 2,433 111
328.0 2 Barstow 18 1,600 89
213.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 1,552 78
291.0 4 Canyons 19 1,053 56
236.0 5 Citrus 22 805 37
206.0 6 Victor Valley 18 638 35
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
175.0 1 Barstow 20 802 285 158 77 124 .355 .426 .460
232.0 2 Glendale 20 793 282 212 106 124 .356 .451 .573
172.0 3 Canyons 20 772 249 155 113 123 .323 .416 .442
122.0 4 Antelope Valley 20 706 213 111 58 150 .302 .363 .401
132.0 5 Citrus 20 676 203 119 97 103 .300 .399 .404
108.0 6 Victor Valley 20 700 197 82 81 132 .281 .374 .364
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
232.0 1 Glendale 20 50 10 34 94
172.0 2 Canyons 20 45 13 7 65
175.0 3 Barstow 20 42 9 8 59
132.0 4 Citrus 20 40 3 8 51
122.0 5 Antelope Valley 20 28 9 8 45
108.0 6 Victor Valley 20 32 1 8 41
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
232.0 1 Glendale 20 232 454 33 11
175.0 2 Barstow 20 175 369 20 6
172.0 3 Canyons 20 172 341 15 6
132.0 4 Citrus 20 132 273 31 9
122.0 5 Antelope Valley 20 122 283 28 9
108.0 6 Victor Valley 20 108 255 43 14
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
232.0 1 Glendale 20 41 12 7 7 148 201 .74 959
175.0 2 Barstow 20 28 8 9 13 185 179 1.03 924
172.0 3 Canyons 20 20 13 12 10 158 153 1.03 930
132.0 4 Citrus 20 24 16 18 11 173 191 .91 831
108.0 5 Victor Valley 20 24 2 5 21 151 126 1.20 812
122.0 6 Antelope Valley 20 15 8 16 19 172 172 1.00 803
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
122.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 172.0 266 194 152 7.95
175.0 2 Barstow 20 20 182.0 253 163 129 6.38
132.0 3 Citrus 20 20 176.2 214 122 103 5.25
172.0 4 Canyons 20 20 178.2 199 135 114 5.74
108.0 5 Victor Valley 20 20 154.1 219 149 120 7.00
232.0 6 Glendale 20 20 180.0 170 90 67 3.35
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
122.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 20 103 5.39 11 2.14
232.0 2 Glendale 20 20 160 8.00 6 -
175.0 3 Barstow 20 20 82 4.05 15 -
172.0 4 Canyons 20 20 117 5.89 15 -
132.0 5 Citrus 20 20 165 8.41 11 -
108.0 6 Victor Valley 20 20 92 5.37 10 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
175.0 1 Barstow 20 746 513 209 24 4 .968
232.0 2 Glendale 20 762 521 214 27 13 .965
172.0 3 Canyons 20 639 450 154 35 9 .945
132.0 4 Citrus 20 725 503 191 31 4 .957
108.0 5 Victor Valley 20 601 409 165 27 9 .955
122.0 6 Antelope Valley 20 785 515 222 48 6 .939
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
122.0 1 Antelope Valley 20 17 30 16 .348 1
108.0 2 Victor Valley 20 9 26 9 .257 -
175.0 3 Barstow 20 19 28 11 .282 -
172.0 4 Canyons 20 7 26 5 .161 -
132.0 5 Citrus 20 13 32 8 .200 -
232.0 6 Glendale 20 16 28 2 .067 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
232.0 1 Glendale 10 1,531 153
175.0 2 Barstow 10 950 95
122.0 3 Antelope Valley 10 742 75
172.0 4 Canyons 10 519 52
132.0 5 Citrus 10 352 35
108.0 6 Victor Valley 10 533 53