Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
370.0 1 Glendale 43 1555 501 319 203 231 .322 .419 .460
303.0 2 Canyons 42 1534 477 274 137 210 .311 .373 .505
300.0 3 Victor Valley 37 1314 408 274 178 278 .311 .408 .446
257.0 4 Barstow 37 1305 396 224 168 207 .303 .398 .411
246.0 5 Citrus 40 1443 403 201 157 265 .279 .365 .382
214.0 6 Antelope Valley 40 1397 386 186 146 226 .276 .352 .374
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
303.0 1 Canyons 42 91 13 60 164
370.0 2 Glendale 43 103 11 30 144
257.0 3 Barstow 37 88 11 10 109
300.0 4 Victor Valley 37 64 9 32 105
246.0 5 Citrus 40 70 9 20 99
214.0 6 Antelope Valley 40 64 23 9 96
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
370.0 1 Glendale 43 370 716 111 32
303.0 2 Canyons 42 303 774 21 10
300.0 3 Victor Valley 37 300 586 12 10
257.0 4 Barstow 37 257 536 26 12
246.0 5 Citrus 40 246 551 49 20
214.0 6 Antelope Valley 40 214 523 27 6
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
370.0 1 Glendale 43 72 24 36 28 409 406 1.01 1890
303.0 2 Canyons 42 29 22 16 32 378 454 .83 1738
246.0 3 Citrus 40 45 11 24 32 351 405 .87 1680
214.0 4 Antelope Valley 40 28 21 23 20 357 408 .88 1615
257.0 5 Barstow 37 49 19 17 30 373 307 1.21 1558
300.0 6 Victor Valley 37 46 10 5 29 294 259 1.14 1553
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
300.0 1 Victor Valley 37 37 308.2 458 373 301 8.78
257.0 2 Barstow 37 37 317.1 499 372 273 7.74
214.0 3 Antelope Valley 40 40 348.1 483 340 275 7.11
246.0 4 Citrus 40 40 367.1 427 231 171 4.19
303.0 5 Canyons 42 42 377.0 370 205 154 3.68
370.0 6 Glendale 43 43 388.0 357 200 156 3.62
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
257.0 1 Barstow 37 37 168 4.76 37 2.05
300.0 2 Victor Valley 37 37 169 4.93 20 2.05
214.0 3 Antelope Valley 40 40 185 4.78 21 1.87
370.0 4 Glendale 43 43 264 6.12 15 -
303.0 5 Canyons 42 42 276 6.59 25 -
246.0 6 Citrus 40 40 287 7.03 17 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
370.0 1 Glendale 43 1708 1162 478 68 10 .960
214.0 2 Antelope Valley 40 1563 1021 477 65 12 .958
303.0 3 Canyons 42 1651 1131 439 81 16 .951
246.0 4 Citrus 40 1653 1102 460 91 7 .945
300.0 5 Victor Valley 37 1238 845 311 82 14 .934
257.0 6 Barstow 37 1390 927 365 98 18 .929
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
370.0 1 Glendale 43 39 18 13 .419 -
303.0 2 Canyons 42 32 29 15 .341 -
246.0 3 Citrus 40 19 46 19 .292 -
257.0 4 Barstow 37 19 42 15 .263 -
214.0 5 Antelope Valley 40 35 58 14 .194 -
300.0 6 Victor Valley 37 23 64 11 .147 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
300.0 1 Victor Valley 18 10,227 569
303.0 2 Canyons 24 2,366 99
370.0 3 Glendale 18 1,422 79
257.0 4 Barstow 16 1,150 72
246.0 5 Citrus 20 1,047 52
214.0 6 Antelope Valley 23 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
233.0 1 Glendale 20 793 290 202 98 102 .366 .450 .545
176.0 2 Canyons 20 757 253 154 66 71 .334 .390 .550
137.0 3 Victor Valley 20 736 222 125 81 147 .302 .385 .412
130.0 4 Barstow 20 694 204 114 77 108 .294 .376 .414
139.0 5 Citrus 20 755 226 118 77 129 .299 .382 .408
107.0 6 Antelope Valley 20 703 193 97 65 121 .275 .347 .374
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
176.0 1 Canyons 20 50 7 33 90
233.0 2 Glendale 20 69 5 21 95
130.0 3 Barstow 20 53 6 6 65
137.0 4 Victor Valley 20 33 3 14 50
139.0 5 Citrus 20 36 5 12 53
107.0 6 Antelope Valley 20 28 12 6 46
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
233.0 1 Glendale 20 233 432 59 14
176.0 2 Canyons 20 176 416 14 6
137.0 3 Victor Valley 20 137 303 6 3
130.0 4 Barstow 20 130 287 9 6
139.0 5 Citrus 20 139 308 23 9
107.0 6 Antelope Valley 20 107 263 14 4
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
233.0 1 Glendale 20 37 16 16 11 177 217 .82 960
176.0 2 Canyons 20 11 13 7 15 187 237 .79 854
139.0 3 Citrus 20 27 4 11 14 169 219 .77 874
107.0 4 Antelope Valley 20 17 8 16 9 159 212 .75 809
130.0 5 Barstow 20 22 13 6 16 198 171 1.16 812
137.0 6 Victor Valley 20 22 6 2 17 172 140 1.23 847
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
137.0 1 Victor Valley 20 20 172.0 275 229 192 10.05
130.0 2 Barstow 20 20 173.1 292 212 151 7.84
107.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 20 173.2 243 173 142 7.36
139.0 4 Citrus 20 20 184.0 228 123 92 4.50
176.0 5 Canyons 20 20 182.0 167 75 53 2.62
233.0 6 Glendale 20 20 186.0 183 110 87 4.21
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
130.0 1 Barstow 20 20 78 4.05 26 2.17
137.0 2 Victor Valley 20 20 83 4.34 17 2.15
107.0 3 Antelope Valley 20 20 95 4.92 14 1.88
233.0 4 Glendale 20 20 134 6.48 10 -
176.0 5 Canyons 20 20 145 7.17 12 -
139.0 6 Citrus 20 20 144 7.04 13 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
233.0 1 Glendale 20 798 556 215 27 5 .966
107.0 2 Antelope Valley 20 752 497 223 32 5 .957
176.0 3 Canyons 20 775 546 204 25 8 .968
139.0 4 Citrus 20 822 552 226 44 3 .946
137.0 5 Victor Valley 20 654 462 146 46 5 .930
130.0 6 Barstow 20 741 495 197 49 6 .934
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
233.0 1 Glendale 20 16 5 5 .500 -
176.0 2 Canyons 20 12 10 6 .375 -
139.0 3 Citrus 20 10 16 7 .304 -
130.0 4 Barstow 20 11 22 6 .214 -
107.0 5 Antelope Valley 20 22 33 5 .132 -
137.0 6 Victor Valley 20 11 39 7 .152 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
137.0 1 Victor Valley 10 227 23
176.0 2 Canyons 10 1,202 121
233.0 3 Glendale 10 866 87
130.0 4 Barstow 10 550 55
139.0 5 Citrus 10 584 58
107.0 6 Antelope Valley 10 0 0