California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
30.0 1	Glendale	43	1555	501	319	203	231	.322	.419	.460
60.0 2	Canyons	42	1534	477	274	137	210	.311	.373	.505
32.0 3	Victor Valley	37	1314	408	274	178	278	.311	.408	.446
10.0 4	Barstow	37	1305	396	224	168	207	.303	.398	.411
20.0 5	Citrus	40	1443	403	201	157	265	.279	.365	.382
9.0 6	Antelope Valley	40	1397	386	186	146	226	.276	.352	.374

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
60.0 1	Canyons	42	91	13	60	164
32.0 2	Victor Valley	37	64	9	32	105
30.0 3	Glendale	43	103	11	30	144
20.0 4	Citrus	40	70	9	20	99
10.0 5	Barstow	37	88	11	10	109
9.0 6	Antelope Valley	40	64	23	9	96

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
30.0 1	Glendale	43	370	716	111	32
60.0 2	Canyons	42	303	774	21	10
32.0 3	Victor Valley	37	300	586	12	10
10.0 4	Barstow	37	257	536	26	12
20.0 5	Citrus	40	246	551	49	20
9.0 6	Antelope Valley	40	214	523	27	6

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
30.0 1	Glendale	43	72	24	36	28	409	406	1.01	1890
60.0 2	Canyons	42	29	22	16	32	378	454	.83	1738
20.0 3	Citrus	40	45	11	24	32	351	405	.87	1680
9.0 4	Antelope Valley	40	28	21	23	20	357	408	.88	1615
10.0 5	Barstow	37	49	19	17	30	373	307	1.21	1558
32.0 6	Victor Valley	37	46	10	5	29	294	259	1.14	1553

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
32.0 1	Victor Valley	37	37	308.2	458	373	301	8.78
10.0 2	Barstow	37	37	317.1	499	372	273	7.74
9.0 3	Antelope Valley	40	40	348.1	483	340	275	7.11
20.0 4	Citrus	40	40	367.1	427	231	171	4.19
60.0 5	Canyons	42	42	377.0	370	205	154	3.68
30.0 6	Glendale	43	43	388.0	357	200	156	3.62

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
10.0 1	Barstow	37	37	168	4.76	37	2.05
32.0 2	Victor Valley	37	37	169	4.93	20	2.05
9.0 3	Antelope Valley	40	40	185	4.78	21	1.87
60.0 4	Canyons	42	42	276	6.59	25	-
30.0 5	Glendale	43	43	264	6.12	15	-
20.0 6	Citrus	40	40	287	7.03	17	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
30.0 1	Glendale	43	1708	1162	478	68	10	.960
9.0 2	Antelope Valley	40	1563	1021	477	65	12	.958
60.0 3	Canyons	42	1651	1131	439	81	16	.951
20.0 4	Citrus	40	1653	1102	460	91	7	.945
32.0 5	Victor Valley	37	1238	845	311	82	14	.934
10.0 6	Barstow	37	1390	927	365	98	18	.929

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
30.0 1	Glendale	43	39	18	13	.419	-
60.0 2	Canyons	42	32	29	15	.341	-
20.0 3	Citrus	40	19	46	19	.292	-
10.0 4	Barstow	37	19	42	15	.263	-
9.0 5	Antelope Valley	40	35	58	14	.194	-
32.0 6	Victor Valley	37	23	64	11	.147	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
32.0 1	Victor Valley	18	10,227	569
60.0 2	Canyons	24	2,366	99
30.0 3	Glendale	18	1,422	79
10.0 4	Barstow	16	1,150	72
20.0 5	Citrus	20	1,047	52
9.0 6	Antelope Valley	23	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
21.0 1	Glendale	20	793	290	202	98	102	.366	.450	.545
33.0 2	Canyons	20	757	253	154	66	71	.334	.390	.550
14.0 3	Victor Valley	20	736	222	125	81	147	.302	.385	.412
6.0 4	Barstow	20	694	204	114	77	108	.294	.376	.414
12.0 5	Citrus	20	755	226	118	77	129	.299	.382	.408
6.0 6	Antelope Valley	20	703	193	97	65	121	.275	.347	.374

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
33.0 1	Canyons	20	50	7	33	90
14.0 2	Victor Valley	20	33	3	14	50
21.0 3	Glendale	20	69	5	21	95
12.0 4	Citrus	20	36	5	12	53
6.0 5	Barstow	20	53	6	6	65
6.0 5	Antelope Valley	20	28	12	6	46

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
21.0 1	Glendale	20	233	432	59	14
33.0 2	Canyons	20	176	416	14	6
14.0 3	Victor Valley	20	137	303	6	3
6.0 4	Barstow	20	130	287	9	6
12.0 5	Citrus	20	139	308	23	9
6.0 6	Antelope Valley	20	107	263	14	4

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
21.0 1	Glendale	20	37	16	16	11	177	217	.82	960
33.0 2	Canyons	20	11	13	7	15	187	237	.79	854
12.0 3	Citrus	20	27	4	11	14	169	219	.77	874
6.0 4	Antelope Valley	20	17	8	16	9	159	212	.75	809
6.0 4	Barstow	20	22	13	6	16	198	171	1.16	812
14.0 6	Victor Valley	20	22	6	2	17	172	140	1.23	847

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
14.0 1	Victor Valley	20	20	172.0	275	229	192	10.05
6.0 2	Barstow	20	20	173.1	292	212	151	7.84
6.0 2	Antelope Valley	20	20	173.2	243	173	142	7.36
12.0 4	Citrus	20	20	184.0	228	123	92	4.50
33.0 5	Canyons	20	20	182.0	167	75	53	2.62
21.0 6	Glendale	20	20	186.0	183	110	87	4.21

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
6.0 1	Barstow	20	20	78	4.05	26	2.17
14.0 2	Victor Valley	20	20	83	4.34	17	2.15
6.0 3	Antelope Valley	20	20	95	4.92	14	1.88
33.0 4	Canyons	20	20	145	7.17	12	-
21.0 5	Glendale	20	20	134	6.48	10	-
12.0 6	Citrus	20	20	144	7.04	13	-

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
21.0 1	Glendale	20	798	556	215	27	5	.966
6.0 2	Antelope Valley	20	752	497	223	32	5	.957
33.0 3	Canyons	20	775	546	204	25	8	.968
12.0 4	Citrus	20	822	552	226	44	3	.946
14.0 5	Victor Valley	20	654	462	146	46	5	.930
6.0 6	Barstow	20	741	495	197	49	6	.934

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
21.0 1	Glendale	20	16	5	5	.500	-
33.0 2	Canyons	20	12	10	6	.375	-
12.0 3	Citrus	20	10	16	7	.304	-
6.0 4	Barstow	20	11	22	6	.214	-
6.0 4	Antelope Valley	20	22	33	5	.132	-
14.0 6	Victor Valley	20	11	39	7	.152	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
14.0 1	Victor Valley	10	227	23
33.0 2	Canyons	10	1,202	121
21.0 3	Glendale	10	866	87
6.0 4	Barstow	10	550	55
12.0 5	Citrus	10	584	58
6.0 6	Antelope Valley	10	0	0