Skip to navigation Skip to content Skip to footer
California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.3313802083333333 1 Palomar 42 1536 509 319 157 214 .331 .409 .456
0.3240418118466899 2 Grossmont 47 1722 558 373 230 258 .324 .415 .477
0.2971342383107089 3 San Diego Mesa 38 1326 394 216 127 245 .297 .377 .418
0.27503429355281206 4 Southwestern 43 1458 401 184 162 252 .275 .359 .343
0.26987951807228916 5 San Diego City 36 1245 336 168 112 246 .270 .343 .349
0.2575075075075075 6 San Bernardino 39 1332 343 163 147 281 .258 .347 .338
0.24673328209069947 7 Mt. San Jacinto 38 1301 321 141 110 278 .247 .322 .327
0.24224519940915806 8 Desert 40 1354 328 144 139 327 .242 .331 .309
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 39 1174 243 71 100 317 .207 .283 .239
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.3240418118466899 1 Grossmont 47 112 16 40 168
0.3313802083333333 2 Palomar 42 99 16 20 135
0.2971342383107089 3 San Diego Mesa 38 84 11 18 113
0.2575075075075075 4 San Bernardino 39 60 10 9 79
0.24673328209069947 5 Mt. San Jacinto 38 62 8 9 79
0.27503429355281206 6 Southwestern 43 61 13 4 78
0.24224519940915806 7 Desert 40 61 12 2 75
0.26987951807228916 8 San Diego City 36 44 18 6 68
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 39 32 3 - 35
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.3240418118466899 1 Grossmont 47 416 822 77 30
0.3313802083333333 2 Palomar 42 369 700 34 15
0.2971342383107089 3 San Diego Mesa 38 238 554 30 17
0.27503429355281206 4 Southwestern 43 222 500 61 20
0.26987951807228916 5 San Diego City 36 208 434 56 21
0.2575075075075075 6 San Bernardino 39 186 450 40 19
0.24224519940915806 7 Desert 40 175 419 27 20
0.24673328209069947 8 Mt. San Jacinto 38 172 426 10 4
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 39 87 281 17 14
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3240418118466899 1 Grossmont 47 51 20 17 36 429 447 .96 2040
0.3313802083333333 2 Palomar 42 63 25 52 25 455 379 1.20 1833
0.27503429355281206 3 Southwestern 43 38 17 30 32 405 374 1.08 1705
0.24224519940915806 4 Desert 40 48 13 28 29 349 339 1.03 1582
0.2971342383107089 5 San Diego Mesa 38 50 12 41 25 324 366 .89 1556
0.2575075075075075 6 San Bernardino 39 41 10 18 27 365 322 1.13 1548
0.24673328209069947 7 Mt. San Jacinto 38 37 5 24 29 320 326 .98 1477
0.26987951807228916 8 San Diego City 36 36 17 17 20 329 324 1.02 1427
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 39 26 3 12 26 328 232 1.41 1315
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.206984667802385 1 Imperial Valley 39 39 305.1 497 422 350 10.32
0.24673328209069947 2 Mt. San Jacinto 38 38 326.2 457 335 256 7.05
0.24224519940915806 3 Desert 40 40 347.2 466 357 271 7.02
0.2575075075075075 4 San Bernardino 39 39 340.1 400 261 198 5.24
0.2971342383107089 5 San Diego Mesa 38 38 331.2 397 253 182 4.94
0.27503429355281206 6 Southwestern 43 43 383.1 356 197 170 3.99
0.26987951807228916 7 San Diego City 36 36 320.2 338 202 141 3.96
0.3240418118466899 8 Grossmont 47 47 420.0 359 171 139 2.98
0.3313802083333333 9 Palomar 42 42 375.0 343 178 122 2.93
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.3313802083333333 1 Palomar 42 42 285 6.84 18 -
0.3240418118466899 2 Grossmont 47 47 347 7.44 12 -
0.2971342383107089 3 San Diego Mesa 38 38 243 6.59 12 -
0.27503429355281206 4 Southwestern 43 43 272 6.39 12 -
0.26987951807228916 5 San Diego City 36 36 244 6.85 10 -
0.2575075075075075 6 San Bernardino 39 39 261 6.90 9 -
0.24673328209069947 7 Mt. San Jacinto 38 38 208 5.73 9 -
0.24224519940915806 8 Desert 40 40 229 5.93 20 -
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 39 39 142 4.19 21 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.3240418118466899 1 Grossmont 47 1800 1260 489 51 15 .972
0.27503429355281206 2 Southwestern 43 1598 1123 424 51 10 .968
0.3313802083333333 3 Palomar 42 1657 1125 469 63 10 .962
0.26987951807228916 4 San Diego City 36 1402 962 379 61 7 .956
0.2971342383107089 5 San Diego Mesa 38 1474 995 403 76 25 .948
0.24224519940915806 6 Desert 40 1518 1043 393 82 18 .946
0.2575075075075075 7 San Bernardino 39 1521 1021 414 86 8 .943
0.24673328209069947 8 Mt. San Jacinto 38 1403 926 393 84 13 .940
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 39 1361 861 407 93 19 .932
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3240418118466899 1 Grossmont 47 35 28 25 .472 -
0.206984667802385 2 Imperial Valley 39 28 44 29 .397 1
0.26987951807228916 3 San Diego City 36 33 28 16 .364 1
0.3313802083333333 4 Palomar 42 25 32 17 .347 1
0.2971342383107089 5 San Diego Mesa 38 24 39 17 .304 2
0.27503429355281206 6 Southwestern 43 25 42 18 .300 -
0.24673328209069947 7 Mt. San Jacinto 38 21 87 23 .209 1
0.24224519940915806 8 Desert 40 30 75 15 .167 -
0.2575075075075075 9 San Bernardino 39 36 65 11 .145 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.3313802083333333 1 Palomar 19 2,287 121
0.26987951807228916 2 San Diego City 19 1,513 80
0.24224519940915806 3 Desert 20 1,560 78
0.24673328209069947 4 Mt. San Jacinto 19 1,007 53
0.2575075075075075 5 San Bernardino 17 666 39
0.27503429355281206 6 Southwestern 22 186 8
0.3240418118466899 7 Grossmont 21 104 5
0.2971342383107089 8 San Diego Mesa 17 67 4
0.206984667802385 9 Imperial Valley 15 20 1
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb k avg obp slg
0.356981981981982 1 Palomar 24 888 317 224 94 107 .357 .432 .498
0.3502202643171806 2 Grossmont 24 908 318 216 126 114 .350 .444 .510
0.30823529411764705 3 San Diego Mesa 24 850 262 147 85 152 .308 .388 .435
0.2783882783882784 4 Southwestern 24 819 228 101 92 136 .278 .361 .348
0.27007299270072993 5 San Diego City 24 822 222 110 68 152 .270 .339 .337
0.2809123649459784 6 San Bernardino 24 833 234 117 89 146 .281 .366 .366
0.24024390243902438 7 Mt. San Jacinto 24 820 197 90 69 173 .240 .319 .327
0.2621359223300971 8 Desert 24 824 216 94 79 176 .262 .346 .331
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 24 766 143 34 57 233 .187 .256 .217
Rk Team gp 2b 3b hr xbh
0.3502202643171806 1 Grossmont 24 64 9 21 94
0.356981981981982 2 Palomar 24 64 11 13 88
0.30823529411764705 3 San Diego Mesa 24 60 6 12 78
0.2809123649459784 4 San Bernardino 24 40 5 7 52
0.24024390243902438 5 Mt. San Jacinto 24 33 7 8 48
0.2783882783882784 6 Southwestern 24 34 7 3 44
0.2621359223300971 7 Desert 24 42 6 1 49
0.27007299270072993 8 San Diego City 24 26 10 3 39
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 24 19 2 - 21
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
0.3502202643171806 1 Grossmont 24 243 463 55 17
0.356981981981982 2 Palomar 24 252 442 21 9
0.30823529411764705 3 San Diego Mesa 24 163 370 20 11
0.2783882783882784 4 Southwestern 24 117 285 37 14
0.27007299270072993 5 San Diego City 24 141 277 43 16
0.2809123649459784 6 San Bernardino 24 129 305 29 13
0.2621359223300971 7 Desert 24 115 273 19 13
0.24024390243902438 8 Mt. San Jacinto 24 107 268 3 2
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 24 41 166 10 9
Rk Team gp hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3502202643171806 1 Grossmont 24 32 7 4 22 206 239 .86 1077
0.356981981981982 2 Palomar 24 36 16 35 15 272 210 1.30 1069
0.2783882783882784 3 Southwestern 24 21 12 16 19 229 227 1.01 960
0.2621359223300971 4 Desert 24 32 9 19 19 219 212 1.03 963
0.30823529411764705 5 San Diego Mesa 24 31 8 26 16 207 232 .89 1000
0.2809123649459784 6 San Bernardino 24 27 7 10 20 228 215 1.06 966
0.24024390243902438 7 Mt. San Jacinto 24 27 3 12 18 193 205 .94 931
0.27007299270072993 8 San Diego City 24 23 11 12 10 219 223 .98 936
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 24 15 2 5 16 198 139 1.42 845
Rk Team app gs ip h r er era
0.1866840731070496 1 Imperial Valley 24 24 205.0 324 264 213 9.35
0.24024390243902438 2 Mt. San Jacinto 24 24 206.2 286 200 150 6.53
0.2621359223300971 3 Desert 24 24 209.0 284 199 142 6.11
0.2809123649459784 4 San Bernardino 24 24 212.2 228 120 96 4.06
0.30823529411764705 5 San Diego Mesa 24 24 210.2 245 137 103 4.40
0.2783882783882784 6 Southwestern 24 24 214.1 198 95 84 3.53
0.27007299270072993 7 San Diego City 24 24 209.2 221 123 91 3.91
0.3502202643171806 8 Grossmont 24 24 214.0 161 69 53 2.23
0.356981981981982 9 Palomar 24 24 214.0 190 100 57 2.40
Rk Team app gs k k/9 hr whip
0.356981981981982 1 Palomar 24 24 166 6.98 12 -
0.3502202643171806 2 Grossmont 24 24 197 8.29 3 -
0.30823529411764705 3 San Diego Mesa 24 24 162 6.92 7 -
0.2783882783882784 4 Southwestern 24 24 168 7.05 7 -
0.27007299270072993 5 San Diego City 24 24 170 7.30 5 -
0.2809123649459784 6 San Bernardino 24 24 164 6.94 5 -
0.24024390243902438 7 Mt. San Jacinto 24 24 136 5.92 7 -
0.2621359223300971 8 Desert 24 24 135 5.81 10 -
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 24 24 92 4.04 12 -
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f%
0.3502202643171806 1 Grossmont 24 887 642 224 21 9 .976
0.2783882783882784 2 Southwestern 24 917 643 253 21 6 .977
0.356981981981982 3 Palomar 24 959 642 271 46 6 .952
0.27007299270072993 4 San Diego City 24 900 629 230 41 4 .954
0.30823529411764705 5 San Diego Mesa 24 923 632 254 37 17 .960
0.2621359223300971 6 Desert 24 923 627 246 50 9 .946
0.2809123649459784 7 San Bernardino 24 936 638 261 37 4 .960
0.24024390243902438 8 Mt. San Jacinto 24 827 566 212 49 7 .941
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 24 874 560 250 64 11 .927
Rk Team gp dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.3502202643171806 1 Grossmont 24 15 12 9 .429 -
0.1866840731070496 2 Imperial Valley 24 14 27 15 .357 1
0.27007299270072993 3 San Diego City 24 22 18 9 .333 1
0.356981981981982 4 Palomar 24 15 11 10 .476 1
0.30823529411764705 5 San Diego Mesa 24 16 22 10 .313 2
0.2783882783882784 6 Southwestern 24 16 25 9 .265 -
0.24024390243902438 7 Mt. San Jacinto 24 12 48 8 .143 1
0.2621359223300971 8 Desert 24 22 39 12 .235 -
0.2809123649459784 9 San Bernardino 24 23 35 8 .186 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
0.356981981981982 1 Palomar 12 1,342 112
0.27007299270072993 2 San Diego City 12 1,008 84
0.2621359223300971 3 Desert 12 936 78
0.24024390243902438 4 Mt. San Jacinto 12 576 48
0.2809123649459784 5 San Bernardino 12 335 28
0.2783882783882784 6 Southwestern 12 86 7
0.3502202643171806 7 Grossmont 12 104 9
0.30823529411764705 8 San Diego Mesa 12 67 6
0.1866840731070496 9 Imperial Valley 12 20 2