California Community College Athletic Association

Team Stats

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
$value 1	San Francisco	37	1228	291	140	139	238	.237	.334	.309
.309 2	De Anza	39	1301	355	198	206	249	.273	.390	.380
.380 3	Chabot	42	1425	400	237	203	317	.281	.395	.422
.422 4	West Valley	39	1338	384	184	157	227	.287	.383	.368
.368 5	San Mateo	42	1437	427	317	244	267	.297	.414	.460
.460 6	Mission	37	1317	410	230	202	188	.311	.416	.422

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
$value 1	San Francisco	37	39	10	10	59
59 2	West Valley	39	68	11	6	85
85 3	De Anza	39	63	5	22	90
90 4	Mission	37	79	17	11	107
107 5	Chabot	42	84	5	36	125
125 6	San Mateo	42	100	25	28	153

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
$value 1	San Francisco	37	157	380	49	28
28 2	West Valley	39	204	492	30	21
21 3	De Anza	39	234	494	78	37
37 4	Chabot	42	266	602	70	36
36 5	Mission	37	271	556	59	17
17 6	San Mateo	42	349	661	50	11

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
$value 1	San Francisco	37	42	5	28	27	394	297	1.33	1442
1442 2	Mission	37	44	15	15	40	330	386	.85	1593
1593 3	De Anza	39	53	13	21	36	364	328	1.11	1594
1594 4	West Valley	39	58	11	44	26	399	340	1.17	1608
1608 5	Chabot	42	70	6	11	41	305	378	.81	1715
1715 6	San Mateo	42	58	23	32	19	335	422	.79	1794

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
$value 1	San Mateo	42	42	378.1	326	156	130	3.09
3.09 2	De Anza	39	39	342.0	321	185	142	3.74
3.74 3	Chabot	42	42	369.2	374	208	175	4.26
4.26 4	San Francisco	37	37	326.1	376	277	226	6.23
6.23 5	Mission	37	37	325.0	375	295	239	6.62
6.62 6	West Valley	39	39	336.2	404	295	250	6.68

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
$value 1	San Mateo	42	42	321	7.64	9	1.25
1.25 2	De Anza	39	39	261	6.87	16	1.47
1.47 3	Chabot	42	42	297	7.23	18	1.55
1.55 4	San Francisco	37	37	183	5.05	14	1.63
1.63 5	West Valley	39	39	220	5.88	26	1.84
1.84 6	Mission	37	37	238	6.59	26	1.86

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
$value 1	Mission	37	1413	975	370	68	22	.952
.952 2	San Francisco	37	1443	979	399	65	17	.955
.955 3	West Valley	39	1487	1010	418	59	16	.960
.960 4	De Anza	39	1511	1026	429	56	25	.963
.963 5	Chabot	42	1571	1109	406	56	16	.964
.964 6	San Mateo	42	1645	1135	464	46	12	.972

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
$value 1	De Anza	39	27	51	12	.190	2
2 2	Chabot	42	37	42	11	.208	2
2 2	San Francisco	37	22	89	26	.226	-
- 4	Mission	37	34	67	25	.272	5
5 5	West Valley	39	24	59	25	.298	-
- 6	San Mateo	42	32	39	22	.361	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
$value 1	San Francisco	18	240	14
14 2	Chabot	18	1,110	62
62 3	De Anza	8	942	118
118 4	San Mateo	26	3,400	131
131 5	West Valley	15	2,052	137
137 6	Mission	17	397,320	23,372

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	k	avg	obp	slg
$value 1	San Francisco	20	664	156	70	77	136	.235	.324	.303
.303 2	De Anza	20	672	190	109	105	144	.283	.399	.379
.379 3	Chabot	20	680	204	143	108	138	.300	.417	.471
.471 4	West Valley	20	699	203	96	74	96	.290	.384	.375
.375 5	San Mateo	20	699	209	167	132	126	.299	.426	.469
.469 6	Mission	20	707	215	107	108	107	.304	.410	.405

Rk	Team	gp	2b	3b	hr	xbh
$value 1	San Francisco	20	17	5	6	28
28 2	West Valley	20	35	6	4	45
45 3	De Anza	20	31	2	10	43
43 4	Mission	20	34	8	7	49
49 5	Chabot	20	43	2	23	68
68 6	San Mateo	20	45	13	16	74

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
$value 1	San Francisco	20	78	201	28	14
14 2	West Valley	20	105	262	14	6
6 3	De Anza	20	123	255	43	21
21 4	Chabot	20	159	320	41	17
17 5	Mission	20	126	286	32	8
8 6	San Mateo	20	186	328	23	4

Rk	Team	gp	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
$value 1	San Francisco	20	11	1	16	16	213	157	1.36	769
769 2	Mission	20	25	8	7	25	172	212	.81	855
855 3	De Anza	20	29	6	7	13	179	155	1.15	819
819 4	West Valley	20	37	8	21	14	203	206	.99	839
839 5	Chabot	20	32	4	5	21	139	189	.74	829
829 6	San Mateo	20	30	9	14	9	145	220	.66	884

Rk	Team	app	gs	ip	h	r	er	era
$value 1	San Mateo	20	20	179.0	154	69	66	3.32
3.32 2	De Anza	20	20	175.0	177	106	83	4.27
4.27 3	Chabot	20	20	176.2	194	117	104	5.30
5.30 4	San Francisco	20	20	175.0	222	163	135	6.94
6.94 5	Mission	20	20	177.0	209	166	135	6.86
6.86 6	West Valley	20	20	174.0	221	156	133	6.88

Rk	Team	app	gs	k	k/9	hr	whip
$value 1	San Mateo	20	20	145	7.29	5	1.30
1.30 2	De Anza	20	20	136	6.99	12	1.57
1.57 3	Chabot	20	20	140	7.13	13	1.69
1.69 4	San Francisco	20	20	78	4.01	10	1.78
1.78 5	West Valley	20	20	107	5.53	9	1.94
1.94 6	Mission	20	20	141	7.17	17	1.85

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%
$value 1	Mission	20	756	531	185	40	16	.947
.947 2	San Francisco	20	778	525	224	29	12	.963
.963 3	West Valley	20	770	522	219	29	10	.962
.962 4	De Anza	20	761	525	206	30	17	.961
.961 5	Chabot	20	734	530	182	22	8	.970
.970 6	San Mateo	20	773	537	218	18	8	.977

Rk	Team	gp	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
$value 1	De Anza	20	14	28	5	.152	1
1 2	Chabot	20	18	24	6	.200	1
1 2	San Francisco	20	14	49	13	.210	-
- 4	Mission	20	20	33	12	.267	1
1 5	West Valley	20	14	31	17	.354	-
- 6	San Mateo	20	18	16	12	.429	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
$value 1	San Francisco	9	200	23
23 2	Chabot	11	760	70
70 3	De Anza	6	625	105
105 4	San Mateo	10	1,300	130
130 5	West Valley	10	1,475	148
148 6	Mission	10	303,928	30,393